5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
ngress has legislated with an expectation that the principle will apply except 'when a statutory purpose to the contrary is evident.'" Id. (quoting Isbrandtsen Co. v. Johnson 343 U.S. 779, 783 (1952)). In this case, however, the Court need not take anything "as given." Even if the statute's language were not c
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
ngress has legislated with an expectation that the principle will apply except 'when a statutory purpose to the contrary is evident.'" Id. (quoting Isbrandtsen Co. v. Johnson 343 U.S. 779, 783 (1952)). In this case, however, the Court need not take anything "as given." Even if the statute's language were not c
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
ngress has legislated with an expectation that the principle will apply except 'when a statutory purpose to the contrary is evident.'" Id. (quoting Isbrandtsen Co. v. Johnson 343 U.S. 779, 783 (1952)). In this case, however, the Court need not take anything "as given." Even if the statute's language were not c
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
ngress has legislated with an expectation that the principle will apply except 'when a statutory purpose to the contrary is evident.'" Id. (quoting Isbrandtsen Co. v. Johnson 343 U.S. 779, 783 (1952)). In this case, however, the Court need not take anything "as given." Even if the statute's language were not c
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
ngress has legislated with an expectation that the principle will apply except 'when a statutory purpose to the contrary is evident.'" Id. (quoting Isbrandtsen Co. v. Johnson 343 U.S. 779, 783 (1952)). In this case, however, the Court need not take anything "as given." Even if the statute's language were not c
Entities connected to both Oliver Stone and Isbrandtsen Co.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONJane Doe
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON
John Kerry
PERSON
Chuck Grassley
PERSON
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION
Schumer
PERSONEvans
PERSON
H.R.
PERSON
Green
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON