Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
lusion."' United States v. Jordan, 915 F.2d 622, 628 (11th Cir. 1990) (quoting Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 525 (1987) (itself quoting Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983))). There is no basis for departing from that rule. Given the strong evidence that Congress did not intend retroactively to a
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (101)
Entities connected to both Oliver Stone and Russello v. United States
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,079 w/ Oliver·6 w/ Russello
LB
Leon Black
PERSON346 w/ Oliver·6 w/ Russello
George W. Bush
PERSON320 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
Prince Andrew
PERSON245 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
United States
LOCATION221 w/ Oliver·6 w/ Russello
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON208 w/ Oliver·6 w/ Russello
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON126 w/ Oliver·6 w/ Russello
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON113 w/ Oliver·6 w/ Russello
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION71 w/ Oliver·6 w/ Russello
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON67 w/ Oliver·6 w/ Russello
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON65 w/ Oliver·6 w/ Russello
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON49 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
John Kerry
PERSON40 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
Chuck Grassley
PERSON38 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION32 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
Schumer
PERSON29 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
EV
Evans
PERSON28 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
H.R.
PERSON24 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
Green
PERSON23 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Russello
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON23 w/ Oliver·4 w/ Russello