Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
statute applies only if the defendant's dominant motive for interstate travel was to engage in unlawful sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Tvkarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006) ("[T]he government must show that the criminal sexual act was a dominant purpose of the trip, not a merely incide
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (101)
Entities connected to both Oliver Stone and Tvkarsky
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,079 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
LB
Leon Black
PERSON346 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
George W. Bush
PERSON320 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Prince Andrew
PERSON245 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
United States
LOCATION221 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON208 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON126 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON113 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION71 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON67 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON65 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON49 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
John Kerry
PERSON40 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Chuck Grassley
PERSON38 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION32 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Schumer
PERSON29 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
EV
Evans
PERSON28 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
H.R.
PERSON24 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
Green
PERSON23 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Tvkarsky
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON23 w/ Oliver·4 w/ Tvkarsky