Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
it' by altering the definition of criminal conduct or increasing the punishment for the crime." Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 441 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981)). United States v. Siegel 153 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added; internal alterations omitted). Even though t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
it' by altering the definition of criminal conduct or increasing the punishment for the crime." Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 441 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981)). United States v. Siegel 153 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added; internal alterations omitted). Even though t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
it' by altering the definition of criminal conduct or increasing the punishment for the crime." Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 441 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981)). United States v. Siegel 153 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added; internal alterations omitted). Even though t
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
it' by altering the definition of criminal conduct or increasing the punishment for the crime." Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 441 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981)). United States v. Siegel 153 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added; internal alterations omitted). Even though t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can b
it' by altering the definition of criminal conduct or increasing the punishment for the crime." Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 441 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981)). United States v. Siegel 153 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added; internal alterations omitted). Even though t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (101)
Entities connected to both Oliver Stone and Weaver v. Graham
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,079 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
LB
Leon Black
PERSON346 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
George W. Bush
PERSON320 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
Prince Andrew
PERSON245 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
United States
LOCATION221 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON208 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON126 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON113 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION71 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON67 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON65 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON49 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
John Kerry
PERSON40 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
Chuck Grassley
PERSON38 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION32 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
Schumer
PERSON29 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
EV
Evans
PERSON28 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
H.R.
PERSON24 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
Green
PERSON23 w/ Oliver·5 w/ Weaver
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON23 w/ Oliver·4 w/ Weaver