Epstein Secrets

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). The legislative

hat the Government is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, because it did not violate the CVRA rights of either petitioner. EFTA00211718 II. JANE DOE NO. 2 CANNOT INVOKE THE CVRA BECAUSE SHE OPENLY OPPOSED AND WAS HOSTILE TO THE PROSECUTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Petitioners have not distinguished the

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). The legislative

iolate the CVRA rights of either petitioner. EFTA00799825 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 408 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2017 Page 2 of 32 II. JANE DOE NO. 2 CANNOT INVOKE THE CVRA BECAUSE SHE OPENLY OPPOSED AND WAS HOSTILE TO THE PROSECUTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Petitioners have not distinguished the

rican Manufacturers Mutual Ins. Co. I. Edward D. Stone Jr. & Assoc., 743 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir. 1984). For

7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02,112008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. I, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs,

erican Manufacturers Mutual Ins. Co. v. Edward,. Stone Jr. & Assoc., 743 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir. 1984). For

nt 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. I, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs,

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). The legislative

late the CVRA rights of either petitioner. EFTA00591462 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 401-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 3 of 33 II. JANE DOE NO. 2 CANNOT INVOKE THE CVRA BECAUSE SHE OPENLY OPPOSED AND WAS HOSTILE TO THE PROSECUTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Petitioners have not distinguished the

rican Manufacturers Mutual Ins. Co. I. Edward D. Stone Jr. & Assoc., 743 F.2d 1519 (1 1 th Cir. 1984). F

R, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JANE DOE NO. 1 REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY Plaintiffs, Jane Doe No. 1, by and through Jane Doe's Father as parent and natural guardian, and Jane Doe's Father and