Epstein Secrets

the light of the Tax Court's correct distinction of this case from, among others. Estate of Scull v. Commissioner. 67 T.C.M. (CCH) 2953 (1994). and Stone v. United States. No. 06-0259. 2007 WI. 2318974. at •3 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10. 2007). The courts in both of those cases awarded nominal discounts, but,

[email protected]] From: Halperin, Alan S Sent: Wed 9/17/2014 1:16:59 PM Subject: RE: Elkins Case Ahh I have the same question. It was not in the Fifth Circuit decision. I am pulling up the Tax Court decision and will let you know. Alan S. Halperin Partner Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Fro

ection quoted from the opinion of Chief Justice Stone in Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 1

order of the district court denying the motion of appellant is affirmed. CITY OF MIANI I SUTTON et al. No. 13113. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. April 25,1050. Dnrward B. Sutton and Sarah R. Sutton. cluing bald flOkIl as the Sutton Jewelry Com- pany hmnght suit against the City of Miami t

aul, M n. (Victor K Anderson, U. S. Atty., of t. Paul, Minn., on the brief), for appellee. Before STONE, SANBORN, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. STONE, Circuit Judge- This is an appeal from a conviction for violation of the White Slave Traffic Act, IS U.S.C.A. § 397 ct seq. Appellant urges here

nce). 10. In Bonner' City of Prichard. 661 F.2d 1206. 1209 (11th Cir.1981) (en bane), we adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit that were rendered prior to October 1, 1981. With this factual background in mind, we turn to whether (when viewed through the prism of abuse of