Epstein Secrets

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). Thus, Congress'

de to the Deputy Attorney General, in support of Epstein's claims that the U.S. Attorney had abused his prosecutorial discretion. On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, sent a letter to Mr. Leflcowitz, advising him that the Deputy Attorney General did not believe interventi

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). The legislative

the Deputy Attorney General. Additional letter briefs were submitted by Epstein's attorneys to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex... On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General wrote to Messrs. Lefkowitz and Stair, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). The legislative

he Deputy Attorney General. Additional letter briefs were submitted by Epstein's attorneys to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex. V. On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, wrote to Messrs. Leflcowitz and Starr, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropria

nterpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone'. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can be

was prepared again, and was reviewed in anticipation of presentation to the grand jury. On June 23, 2008, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General John Roth denied the various appeals of Epstein's attorneys and wrote, "Even if we were to substitute our judgment for that of the U.S. Attorney, we believe

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). The legislative

he Deputy Attorney General. Additional letter briefs were submitted by Epstein's attorneys to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex. V. On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, wrote to Messrs. Leflcowitz and Starr, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropria