Epstein Secrets

. Negligence 186-881 In New York, a plaintiff may establish negligent infliction of emotional distress under the bystander or direct duty theory. Baker v. Dorfman, 239 F.3d 415, 421 (2d Cir2000). Under the by- stander theory, "a defendant's conduct is negligent as creating an unreasonable risk of

mbia, S.A. v. Hall, 466 U.S. 408, 411-12, 416-18, 104 S.Ct. 1868, 80 L.Ed.2d 404 (1984); Borsch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 519 F.2d 974, 998 (2c1 Cir.1975) (buying and selling American securities is insufficient to estab- lish that defendant was "doing business" in the United States). Prince Mohamed s

ir.1982); Rheatune v. Tex. Dept of Public Safety. 666 F2d 930 (5th ar.1982); United Carolina Bank Board of Tutu, 665 F.2d 553. 562 (5th Cir.I k Baker Norman, 651 F.2d 1107. 1121 (5th Cir.1981))• to obtain medical treatment Again, these claims could survive the government de- fenses of qualified

ckler, 717 F.2d 36, 41 (2d Cir.1983), art. denied, — U.S —, 104 S.Ct. 1713, 80 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); Frontera v Sindell, 522 F.2d 1215, 1219-20 (6th Cir.1975); see also Garcia v. Gloor, 618 F.2d 264, 268 (5th Cir.1980) ("Neither [Title VII] nor com- mon understanding equates national origin with the lan

efendant fails to object at trial to the admission i of evidence, the court reviews the distri court's ruling for plain error only. United States Baker. 432 F.3d 1189, 1202 (11th Cir.2005). " ere an appellant has objected to a jury instruction at trial, f we review the court's decision to use tha

n Act. See, e.g., United States I Boyd, 610 F.2d 521 (8th Cir.197/), cert. denied,444 U.S. 1089 (1980); United States I Harris, 534 F.2d 207 (10th Cir.1975), cert. dented,429 U.S. 941 (1976). Moreover, the trial court questioned pro- spective jurors about their ability to view graphic photographs, some