Epstein Secrets

. The email requested that Jenne, Adler, Berger, Barry Stone, Mike Wheeler, Cara Holmes, Rob Buschel, Fi

e of obtaining Richie's investment in the Epstein actions. Epstein believes that the federal complaint in L.M. v. Epstein was shown to Legamaro and Ritchie at that time and that it was prepared by Edwards with highly-charged sexual allegations solely to be shown to induce investment in the Epstein Acti

ad stacked around the conference room. 17. On or about October 13, 2009, Illinois attorney, Michael Legamaro, and his client, hedge fund operator Thane Ritchie, were also invited to examine Epstein case files and a flight log displayed by Rothstein that allegedly contained the names of numerous celebrities

. The email requested that Jenne, Adler, Berger, Barry Stone, Mike Wheeler, Cara Holmes, Rob Buschel, Fi

ad stacked around the conference room. 17. On or about October 13, 2009, Illinois attorney, Michael Legamaro, and his client, hedge fund operator Thane Ritchie, were also invited to examine Epstein case files and a flight log displayed by Rothstein that allegedly contained the names of numerous celebrities

e of obtaining Richie's investment in the Epstein actions. Epstein believes that the federal complaint in L.M. v. Epstein was shown to Legamaro and Ritchie at that time and that it was prepared by Edwards solely to be shown to induce investment in the Epstein Actions and advance the Ponzi scheme, as de

Chris Podaras Thane Ritchie Michael Szafranski Barry Bekkedam Elizabeth Friedland Michael Legomaro

estments or Fortress Capital Drawbridge Banyon Investments Cetnurion Credit Fund Platinum Management Fund NAMES FROM S. Discala Chris Podaras Thane Ritchie Michael Szafranski Barry Bekkedam Elizabeth Friedland Michael Legomaro Ken Jenne Mike Fisten Saudi Prince Bill Clinton Naomi Campbell Ted W

999 NW 5P' Street Boca Raton, FL 33431-4477 9. Barry Stone 6740 Chimere Terrace Boynton Beach, FL 33

oor 3 Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154-2025 33. A. J. Discala Canvas Financial, LLC 303 Park Avenue South, Suite 1401 New York, NY 10001-0646 34. Thane Ritchie 4 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301• 954.467.1223 EFTA00798221 Address unknown at this time 35. Dean Kretschma

. Clarendon Press, 2005. Gallwey, W Timothy, and Barry Green. Inner Game of Music. 7th ed. Pan, 2003. H

y of Relativity 366 Renaissance 16, 297 Reykjavik 79 rice covering chessboard 163 Rice's Theorem 267 Riemann Hypothesis 238, 257 Riemann surfaces 368 Ritchie, Graeme 310 Rivest, Ron 165 Robinson Davis Matiyasevich theory 248 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016105 416 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet? Robinson, Julia 248,

the 'external party."' Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico' United States Dept of Justice, 1992 WL 119127 at •3 (D.D.C. May 13, 1992) (citing Barry v. United States, 740 F. Supp. 888, 891 (D.D.C. 1990) ("Rule 6(e) does not create a type of secrecy which is waived once public disclosure occurs. T

3771(d)(3). Petitioners' attempt to engraft a right of access to government information to section 3771(c)(1) should be rejected. In Pennsylvania'. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witnes

e 'external party."' Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. United States Dep't of Justice, 1992 WL 119127 at *3 (D.D.C. May 13, 1992) (citing Barry v. United States, 740 F. Supp. 888, 891 (D.D.C. 1990) ("Rule 6(e) does not create a type of secrecy 'It is worth noting that, within the same case,

3771(d)(3). Petitioners' attempt to engraft a right of access to government information to section 3771(cXI) should be rejected. In Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witnes

he 'external party."' Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico'. United States Dep't of Justice, 1992 WL 119127 at *3 (D.D.C. May 13, 1992) (citing Barry. United States, 740 F. Supp. 888, 891 (D.D.C. 1990) ("Rule 6(e) does not create a type of secrecy 'It is worth noting that, within the same case, a

3771(d)(3). Petitioners' attempt to engraft a right of access to government information to section 3771(cXI) should be rejected. In Pennsylvania'. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witnes

1985) (emphasis added) (quoting United States v. Miller, 722 F.2d 562, 563 (9th Cir.1983)). 76 For alter

s typically apply to exculpatory material within the possession or control of the state. 3° For example, in the Supreme Court case of Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, the defendant sought recorded statements made to a youth counselor concerning an alleged assault. 3°7 The recorded statements were taken and possess