Epstein Secrets

••••• APPEARANCES: 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY g. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 Nor

lude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See Stale tuc rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband

O 12 APPEARANCES: 13 ON BEHALF OP THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 Nor

granted, and the remedial quality of any such harm. See Perez v. Perez, 769 So. 2d 389, 391 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So. 2d 1037, 1038 n.3 (Fla. 1980). The trial court agreed that Mr. Epstein had established irreparable harm (A-17:16), denied a 7 EFTA0018064

IN) 4-14 N, r^r-) 13 ON BEHALF OP THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 Nor

clude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 1.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband p

PUCILtark., 1.-;; 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 Nor

clude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband