Epstein Secrets

with that, 24 or were you, Tom? 25 MR. SCOTT: No. www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615730 610 1 MR. INDYKE: No, not directly. 2 MR. EDWARDS: Martin Weinberg and Roy 3 Black represented Jeffrey Epstein there. The 4 government, I believe, was represented by 5 in the argument. And we were the 6 other

INDYKE: No, not directly. 2 MR. EDWARDS: Martin Weinberg and Roy 3 Black represented Jeffrey Epstein the

ut I don't have a current recollection. Given the two signatures at the bottom, a reasonable interpretation of that be "as we" Yes. -- "Alan and Gerald"? Yes. Comma, "Mr. Epstein never targeted www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615736 616 1 minors." 2 Do you see that? 3 A. Yes. 4 Q. Is tha

letter from Villafatia 3/4/2010 Roy Black and Martin Weinberg Critton Letter on thoughts and issues concernin

il containing Acosta edits to Agreement 9/24/2007 Villafaiia Lefkowitz Email - 1 page with nine page NPA (3 signature pages) attached 9/24/2007 Weinberg, Laurie, Garcia Villafafia Email containing Acosta's final edits and asking to discuss potential victim representative 9/24/2007 Acosta, Sloman

regarding addendum to Pros Memo, grand jury presentation, changes to indictmer it. and meeting with counsel for Epstein. 32 6/25/2007 Letter from Gerald I efcourt tojeffrey Montan and Andrew Laurie regarding 6/26/2007 meeting and emails and notes regarding same. PRIVILEGED and CONFII)ENTIAL Page 1

o their future rights as employees. °3Comment of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld. 947d. °5Comment of Staff Re

justify the promulgation of the notice-posting rule by relying on evidence that employees lacked knowledge of their rights. Moreover, in 185 Mayer, Gerald, “Union Membership Trends in the United States” (2004). Federal Publications. Paper 174, Appendix A. http:// digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workp