Epstein Secrets

SERVICE The foregoing document was served on May 17, 2011, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Es Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 8 EFTA00205018 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 [email protected] (via U.S. mail) 9 EFTA00205019

: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Es Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 8 EFTA00205018 West Palm Beach, FL 3340

ervention by a person who has "a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact." Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b); accord Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. I. Sandy Lake Properties, Inc., 425 F.3d 1308, 1311 (11th Cir. 2005) (intervention allowed only where "a claim or defense and the main action h

RICA, Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION FOR INTERVENTION BY EPSTEINS' ATTORNEYS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz ("Epstein's Attorneys") (DE 56). This matter is fully briefed and is now ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the

pon the Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz ("Epstein's Attorneys") (DE 56

question of law or fact in common and the intervention will not unduly prejudice or delay the adjudication of the rights of the original parties." Mt. Hawley Ins. Co... Sandy Lake Properties, Inc. 425 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2005) (citing Georgia United States Army Corps of Eng'rs, 302 F.3d 1242, 1250 (11i

May 2, 2011. on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. ism Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 8 EFTA00207983

ONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE OF ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane

substantial, legally protectable interest in the proceedings." Purcell I BankAtlantic Financial Corp., 85 F.3d 1508, 1512 (11th Cir. 1996); accord Mt. Hawley Ins. Co.l Sandy Lake Properties, Inc., 425 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 2005). The The defense attorneys have not claimed that they should be permitted to inter

Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. Boulevaitl, Suite 1300 7 EFTA00795280 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)16.2011 Page 8 of 8 Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstei (courtesy copy of pleading via U.S. mail) Bru

on FLSD Docket 05)16.2011 Page 8 of 8 Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Bur

ervention by a person who has "a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact." Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b); accord Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Sandy Lake Properties, Inc., 425 F.3d 1308, 1311 (11th Cir. 2005) (intervention allowed only where "a claim or defense and the main action h

overnment Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 i i FL 33131 ia Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 B° sto MI n MA 02116 Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 777 S. Flagler Drive, West Tower, Suite 901

Boulevard Suite 1300 i i FL 33131 ia Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 B° sto MI n MA

ubstantial, legally protectable interest in the proceedings." Purcell v. Bank/Mantic Financial Corp., 85 F.3d 1508, 1512 (I I th Cir. 1996); accord Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Sandy Lake Properties, Inc., 425 F.3d 1308 (1Ith Cir. 2005). The The defense attorneys have not claimed that they should be permitted to int

has an interest in the validity of the non-prosecution agreement . . . ." Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2's Response To Motion To Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz [DE 78] at 4. And third, in their "Motion to Use Correspondence To Prove Violations of The Crime Victim 's Rights Act And To Hav

pposition to the intervention of attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz that Mr. Epstein "is the real par

TA00177878 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2.011 Page 2 of 9 See El-Ad Residences at Miramar Condo. Ass'''. Inc. I Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 716 F. Supp. 2d 1257, 1262 (S.D. Fla. 2010), quoting In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Newparent Inc.), 274 F.3d 563, 570 (1st Cir. 2001) (in the co