Epstein Secrets

From: Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 11:30 AM To: (USANYS) > Subject: FW: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Please see below. Thanks. (USANYS) From: Martin G. Weinberg c Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 8:31 AM To: <> 'Marc Fernich' c > 'Martin Weinberg' a> Cc: 'Marty Weinberg' Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure I

see below. Thanks. (USANYS) From: Martin G. Weinberg c Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 8:31 AM To: <> 'Marc Fernich' c > 'Martin Weinberg' a> Cc: 'Marty Weinberg' Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Good morning The purpose of this email is to address two issues separate from the ongoing bail/detention

we have raised regarding the NPA. I am not by this email seeking their discovery (a future issue), only an agreement on their preservation. Thanks Marty Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. Mr EFTA00068250 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and ma

ase see below. Thanks. (USANYS) From: Martin G. Weinberg c Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 8:31 AM To: <> '

SD Fla. That is not surprising since they are recused. Would you inform the defense whether there has been a similar absence of any contact with the ND Ga prosecutors (in particular and/or ) or with Main Justice (eg CEOS or others)? I would also want to explore with you an agreement on preserving em

From: "Martin G. WeinbenZ To: )." , "Reid Weingarten" Subject: US v Epstein Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:24:35 +0000 did you determine whether you would advise other releva

request for all communications with SDNY, Main Justice and with any plaintiffs lawyers or their clients that relate in anyway to Mr Epstein, thanks, Marty Martin G. Weinber• Esq. - Office - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may

for all communications with SDNY, Main Justice and with any plaintiffs lawyers or their clients that relate in anyway to Mr Epstein, thanks, Marty Martin G. Weinber• Esq. - Office - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The infor

ins information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is

Weingarten" Subject: US v Epstein Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:24:35 +0000 did you determine whether you would advise other relevant Party's (eg the ND Ga prosecutors assigned to the CVRA case) that the defense in the SDNY has made a preservation request for all communications with SDNY, Main Justice a

mation as further protection against any taint. thanks, From: Martin G. Weinberg < Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 08:31 To: >; 'Marc Fernich' a> 'Martin Weinberg' < MI> Cc: 'Marty Weinberg' < Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Good morning The purpose of this email is to address two issues separate f

_Arrest_Seizure_Items(1).msg I received bounce-back messages for two att.net emails in response to the below (attached), so just want to make sure, Marty, that you were able to receive the email at your firm email address. Thanks. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 11:42 To: 'Martin G. Weinberg' < >

nt to make sure, Marty, that you were able to receive the email at your firm email address. Thanks. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 11:42 To: 'Martin G. Weinberg' < >; 'Marc Fernich' <a> Cc: 'Marty Weinberg' c a>, Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Hi Marty, In reverse order, we're not prepared to ma

From: "- To: 'Marty Weinberg' <1 Cc: tt , " 'Marc Fernich' Subject: RE:

SD Fla. That is not surprising since they are recused. Would you inform the defense whether there has been a similar absence of any contact with the ND Ga prosecutors (in particular br with Main Justice (eg CEOS or others)? I would also want to explore with you an agreement on preserving emaiis, text

Marc Fernich' ;'Martin Weinberg' EFTA00095379 Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disc

From: To: "Martin G. Weinberg" Cc: 'Mart Weinbe Subject: RE: Epstein - Legal Issues and Requests Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 02:56:37 +0000 Marty, I stand corrected regarding the timing of the recusal of SDFL from potential prosecution; I hadn't realized that (which may further show that any

, and please let us know if additional information would be useful. thanks, From: Martin G. Weinberg Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 18:46 To: Cc: 'Marty Weinberg' ; Subject: Epstein - Legal Issues and Requests Hi M , the SD Fla was ordered recused by the DOJ from criminal matters concerning Mr Epstein at I

it from having that information as further protection against any taint. thanks, From: Martin G. Weinberg Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 08:31 To: Weinberg' < > Cc: 'Marty Weinberg' 'Marc Fernich' •‘->; 'Martin •> Subject: RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items Good morning The purpose of this email is t

SD Fla. That is not surprising since they are recused. Would you inform the defense whether there has been I similar absence of any contact with the ND Ga prosecutors (in particular and/or Mr ) or with Main Justice (eg CEOS or others)? I would also want to explore with you an agreement on preserving

From: " To: "Martin Ci. Weinberg" Cc: " Subject: RE: US v Epstein Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:10:43 +0000 Reid Weingarten < Marty, We have addressed this internally, following up

From: " To: "Martin Ci. Weinberg" Cc: " Subject: RE: US v Epstein Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:10:43 +0000 Reid Weingarten < Marty, We have addressed this internally, following up on our general discussions on the subject, and what we need from the defense, please, is a formali

retention policy for electronic communications in the normal course. thank you, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York MEM From: Martin G. Weinberg Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 08:25 To: >; Reid Weingarten < u ject: US v Epstein did you determine whether you would advise other relevant Party'

iday, July 26, 2019 08:25 To: >; Reid Weingarten < u ject: US v Epstein did you determine whether you would advise other relevant Party's (eg the ND Ga prosecutors assigned to the CVRA case) that the defense in the SDNY has made a preservation request for all communications with SDNY, Main Justice a