Epstein Secrets

with. See Letter of Peter Schoenburg to Martin G. Weinberg, August 18, 2010 (Exhibit D); see also NMSA 1978

fender reporting statute, notwithstanding his Florida conviction and the conduct alleged in connection therewith. See Letter of Peter Schoenburg to Martin G. Weinberg, August 18, 2010 (Exhibit D); see also NMSA 1978, § 29-11A-3(E). [Do we have the letter from Ms. Chacon in NM Department of Public Safety?] [Is Eps

t. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a matter of discretion") (citing People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 568 n.2 (2009); People v. Johnson, 11 N.Y.3d 416, 418, 421 (2008)). As noted above, Jeffrey Epstein presents a negligible risk of r

property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date

" and that hearsay evidence "may be attacked in any of the usual ways"). The People acknowledge as much in their citation and repeated reference to People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 577 (2009) (noting the unreliability of a victim's statement where it is "equivocal, inconsistent with other evidence, or seems dub

property in Manhattan.2 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date

y proven false, and directly contradicted by non-hearsay evidence. CITE. The People acknowledge as much in their citation and repeated reference to People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 577 (2009) (noting the unreliability of a victim statement where it is "equivocal, inconsistent with other evidence, or seems dubio

property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date

" and that hearsay evidence "may be attacked in any of the usual ways"). The People acknowledge as much in their citation and repeated reference to People v. Mingo, 12 IMI.3d 563, 577 (2009) (noting the unreliability of a victim statement where it is "equivocal, inconsistent with other evidence, or seems dubio