Epstein Secrets

t with the *226 defense by decid- ing after two years that it wanted a new ex- pert. Id. The court also denied as premature Fell's motion to exclude Weiner's testi- mony, holding that the nature and scope of Webees anticipated rebuttal testimony was unclear but that, even without interviewing Fell, hi

factors concerning sentencing." Id. Accordingly, the court declined to rule on admissibility prior to the government's disclosure of the scope of Weiner's projected testimony. Pursuant to the court's April 7 2005 or- der, Wetzel interviewed Fell and prepared a report explaining his findings. Fell, 2

. The priv- ilege protects only those communications that are confidential and are made for the purpose of seeking or receiving legal ad- vice. See Rollin, 264 F.3d at 412; see also 8 John Henry Wigmore, Evidence § 2292, at 554 (John T. McNaughton ed. 1961). The idea that the attorney-client privileg

st targeting witnesses — allowing Trump to criticize them if his remarks were not connected to their roles in the case. The Washington Post (12/08, Weiner) noted that the appellate judges said they were limited in their ruling by the fact that Chutkan justified her order as necessary only to avoid infl

rges. According to the article, Bowman is being accused of violating the Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act for being in a manager role of the Rollin' 60's gang. He is also being charged with the illegal use of communication for using a cell phone to set up the sale of marijuana. The Rolling Stone

director at the investment banking firm Perella Weinberg Partners, for tipping his father (and co-defendan

19 U.S. v. Owen, et al. (VM) (USA() # 2015R00928) (Fender/Chow/ICelly) (VOC). The defendants are charged in connection with their membership in the Rollin 30s set of the Crips. Four defendants remain in the case, including the leader of the set. They face racketeering, narcotics, and firearms charges.