Epstein Secrets

with that, 24 or were you, Tom? 25 MR. SCOTT: No. www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615730 610 1 MR. INDYKE: No, not directly. 2 MR. EDWARDS: Martin Weinberg and Roy 3 Black represented Jeffrey Epstein there. The 4 government, I believe, was represented by 5 in the argument. And we were the 6 other

INDYKE: No, not directly. 2 MR. EDWARDS: Martin Weinberg and Roy 3 Black represented Jeffrey Epstein the

ls (22) 582:12,23 government (3) hands (4) 464:15 490:17,25 583:21 588:11 609:9,10610:4 475:16,17,17,18 gather (1) 491:18,24 603:14 605:2 Grail (1) Hang (9) 589:22 492:17 493:11 605:17 611:23 544:15 469:10 478:1,22 general (7) 539:16 541:13 611:23 614:14 grand (2) 504:1 521:6 464:

and Lades to hoe scant ad Nat Dry. nob (59 Soon Marty. Federal tzeireimeN Paynws. *I TO FIND OW IF A

rr tear al doosmenis lyporar! nsznylon rtmadtg Vas EAT MacnenI Baba su)polio Teem RAM Fate Ons shal te compact vela Inc Cr tar yore Eerily Until Grail 40a:Oril tug re Average OM/ Eau( system. The Cage re total/at anaaal c'Aei eat day in Vs =Wry la the ante et &pet taro wod ti e atat Se atatied t

fficiently specific" if it "identifies 'a group of records likely to contain helpful documents." (Defs.' PRI Opp'n, at 27 (quoting United States v. Weisberg, No. 08-CR-347 (NGG) (RML), 2011 WI. 1327689, at •7 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2011).) The subpoena requests in Weisberg, however, were much more specific t

hose types of documents may themselves be admissible into evidence. United States v. Orena, 883 F. Supp. 849, 869 (E.D.N.Y. 1995); United States v. Grail°, No. 10 CR 654 HB, 2012 WL 1195194, at *2 (3.1).N.Y. Apr. 9, 2012) (Baer, J.) 3 EFTA00076470 Case 1:15-cr-00317-KMW Document 323 Filed 05/17/18