Epstein Secrets

letter of July 27, 2011 to my co-counsel Martin Weinberg in regards to the request by the New York Distric

Villafana Assistant United States Attorney WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms Villafana Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2011 to my co-counsel Martin Weinberg in regards to the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of the NPA and the "victim list" in regards to Mr. Epstein. We continue for

ntiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States 9:08cv80736-KAM that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in par 6 of document 14, your own declaration, you stated that the NPA con

DIATELY AT: (312) 862-2000, To: CC: Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. Company: Fax it: Direct #: prated Stat

CTLY PROHIBITED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AT: (312) 862-2000, To: CC: Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. Company: Fax it: Direct #: prated States Attorney, Southern bistrict of Florida Company: Fax #: Direct it: From: Sandra Musumeci for

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated that

igation. Accordingly, we request that you reconsider and decline the request of the New York District Attorney. Sincerely, Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Martin G. Weinberg JPL/kla Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down prior to September 30, 1981, are binding as precedent in

r letter of July 27, 2011 to my co-counsel Martin Weinberg concerning the request by the New York District

tiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated th

CTLY PROHIBITED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AT: (312) 862-2000. To: CC: Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. Company; Pax #: Direct #: United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida Company: Fax #: Direct it From: Sandra Musumeci for

3 MR. CRITTON: Your Honor, we have two members of the 14 defense team are on the phone, also. 15 THE COURT: Who do we have on the phone? 16 MR. WEINBERG: Martin Weinberg. Good morning, Your 17 Honor. 18 MR. LEFKOWITZ: Jay Lefkowitz. Good morning, Your 19 Honor. 20 THE COURT: Good morning. 21 I

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated tha

CTLY PROHIBITED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AT: (312) 862-2000, To: CC: Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. Company: United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida Company: Fax #: Direct #: Fax #: Direct tt: From: Sandra Musumeci for

DIATELY AT: (312) 862-2000, To: CC: Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. Company: United States Attorney, Souther

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated tha