Epstein Secrets

Perczek, Esq. Black Srebnick Korns . an & Stum.f P.A. Miami, FL 33131 Email: Jay P. Lefkowitz Kirkland & Ellis, LLP New York NY 10022 Email: Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. Boston MA 02116 Email: Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 18 EFTA00208607

Ellis, LLP New York NY 10022 Email: Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. Boston MA 02116 Email: Criminal Defense

n trust funds, contending that the federal agencies are "often charged with protecting competing interests, including some potentially adverse to a Tribe's interest." Id. at 247. The district court rejected these arguments, finding the claim "that the government's sovereign interests somehow negate or

yne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL Telephone: Email: Jay P. Leflcowitz Kirkland & Ellis, LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York Telephone Email: Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: Email: Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 9 EFTA

on Avenue New York Telephone Email: Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 0211

in trust by the Government because of "common-law trust principles." Id. at 2325. In rejecting the tribe's claim, the Supreme Court held that "the Tribe must point to a right conferred by statute . . . in order to obtain otherwise privilege information from the Government against its wishes." Id. (e

oy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, Gerald Lefcourt, Michael Tien, Guy Lewis, Lilly

om (305) 37106421 Jay P. Lefkowitz Kirkland & Ellis, LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Email: [email protected] (212) 446-4970 Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Email: [email protected] (617) 338-9538 Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley

n trust funds, contending that the federal agencies are "often charged with protecting competing interests, including some potentially adverse to a Tribe's interest." Id. at 247. The district court rejected these arguments, finding the claim "that the government's sovereign interests somehow negate or