Epstein Secrets

and asked if he used the racist slur." Stone "denied using the slur" and "claimed that O'Kelly was 'out of [his] mind." The Washington Post (7/19, Weiner, Roig-Franzia, 14.2M) reports that in a statement emails to the Post, Stone "suggested it was O'Kelly's 'studio engineer' who used the word. He als

trzok wrote, "Again, we are unaware of ANY Trump advisors engaging in conversations with Russian intelligence officials." The New York Times (7/17, Savage, Goldman, 18.61M) reported documents released on Friday "showed a top FBI agent recognized by February 2017 that a now notorious dossier of claims

eported on the story. Three-Judge Panel Poised to Uphold Jan. 6 Obstruction Cases Politico (05/11, Cheney) and the Washington Post (05/11, Jackman, Weiner) reported that the Dal seems likely to win an important appeals court case that could affect hundreds of Jan. 6 prosecutions for obstruction of Cong

inion piece. Back to Top COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FBI Violations of Rules for Searching Surveillance Data Drop, Audit Finds The New York Times (05/11, Savage) reported that recent data from the auditing office of the FBI indicates that changes implemented by the agency have significantly improved complian

xaminer (01/05, Seven) also reported on the story. Google Location Data Was Used To Find Jan. 6 Rioters. It's Disappearing. Washington Post (01/06, Weiner, Harwell) reported that Google's location data, used to identify hundreds of participants in the January 6 Capitol riot, will soon become inaccessib

n insurrection from holding public office. Three Years After Jan. 6, Trump's Immunity Claims To Take Center Stage The New York Times (01/05, Feuer, Savage) reported that three years after the Capitol riot, former President Donald Trump's legal team is arguing in a federal appeals court that he should h

st targeting witnesses — allowing Trump to criticize them if his remarks were not connected to their roles in the case. The Washington Post (12/08, Weiner) noted that the appellate judges said they were limited in their ruling by the fact that Chutkan justified her order as necessary only to avoid infl

laims by defense attorneys that restrictions on the ex-president's speech amount to an unconstitutional muzzling. The New York Times (12/08, Feuer, Savage) explained that in its ruling, a three-judge panel sought to strike a cautious balance between what it called "two foundational constitutional value