Epstein Secrets

e more minutes. I want to know: Was it Mr. Dershowitz who made that comment "move on" because if it wasn't, there's somebody else on the fine -- MR. WEINBERG: I --I-- MR. SCAROLA: -- that refuses to identify themselves. MR, WEINBERG: Marty Weinberg for Epstein. I've been on the line on occasion. I have a

ecause if it wasn't, there's somebody else on the fine -- MR. WEINBERG: I --I-- MR. SCAROLA: -- that refuses to identify themselves. MR, WEINBERG: Marty Weinberg for Epstein. I've been on the line on occasion. I have a mute button and have said nothing and just kept on going with no statements on my end. MR.

at refuses to identify themselves. MR, WEINBERG: Marty Weinberg for Epstein. I've been on the line on oc

. yesterday. That was the Jane Doe case in Federal Court in front of Judge Marra. There were two state claims. I'll -- I'll identify the clients as E.W. and L.M. Q. And then the fourth one? A. The fourth one, I believe -- the initial M. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 261 and I believe

her discussions. Respectfully submitted, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY SLACK, ESQ. By /wg cc: Jeffrey Slo

reement will provide a basis for a prompt resolution of any issue not resolved by the parties through further discussions. Respectfully submitted, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY SLACK, ESQ. By /wg cc: Jeffrey Sloman, Esq. Robert Senior, Esq. Black, Srebnick. Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00193777 ROY BLACK

se cases involving Epstein); b. Reached agreements to share attorneys fees with non-lawyers; c. Used investor money to pay plaintiffs (i.e., L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) "up front" money such that plaintiffs would refuse to settle the Civil Actions; d. Conducted searches, wiretaps or intercepted conver

ed she worked at eleven (11) separate strip clubs, Including Cheetah which RRA represented and in which ROTHSTEIN may have owned an interest; and E.W. also worked at Platinum Showgirls in Boynton Beach, which was the subject of a recent police raid where dancers were allegedly selling prescriptio

ESQ. Atterbury Goldberger Weiss Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 East Broward Boulevard 16 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 For U.S.A. 17 18 19 20 21 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. (Via telephone) REPORTED BY: LARRY HERR, RPR-RMR-FCRR-AE 22 Official United States Court Reporter Federally Certifie

3 MR. CRITTON: Your Honor, we have two members of the 14 defense team are on the phone, also. 15 THE COURT: Who do we have on the phone? 16 MR. WEINBERG: Martin Weinberg. Good morning, Your 17 Honor. 18 MR. LEFKOWITZ: Jay Lefkowitz. Good morning, Your 19 Honor. 20 THE COURT: Good morning. 21 I

not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respondent points out, the Agreement was not filed in this 10 The Post adopts and incorporates E.W.'s arguments and analysis on this issue in addition to the arguments it sets forth herein. " The Post notes that A-3 through A-5 were not part of th

at the reply is due 10 days from service of the last-filed response. Opposing counsel has contacted counsel for respondents (William J. Berger for E.W.; Diana L. Martin for B.B.; and Deanna K. Shullman for the Post), who have all advised they have no objection to this motion. 2 EFTA00233660 -Q-~

COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:27:00 PM 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • • J8RsEPSl I i MR. WEINBERG: Judge, if I can just supplement? THE COURT: Absolutely. ’ MR. WEINBERG: Thank you, sir. Thank you, as an out-of-town lawyer for the privilege to app

ng. First of all, whether relevant or not, I personally, and on behalf of my clients, do appreciate the presentation that Mr. Weingarten made and Mr. Marty Weinberg made. I have tremendous respect for Mr. Weinberg. I've worked with him through this and related cases for years, and I understand the reason why they

the presentation that Mr. Weingarten made and Mr. Marty Weinberg made. I have tremendous respect for Mr.

h to do so today. "It.is against public policy for these documents to be have been sealed and hidden from public scrutiny. As a member of the public, E.W. has a right to have these documents unsealed," wrote former CircuitJudge Bill Berger, now in private practice-and representing one ofthe women. The P

PsholeadaPoetcoodcetweries PEARL FEINBERG Pearl Feinberg, 94 of Royal Palm Bach. FL and %may of Monticelo. NY passed away on June 9. 2009. Mrs. Feinberg was predeceased by her hawed in husband Dr. Nathan I Feinberg DP 2001. Na She is survived by loving day t Dee Sams and Lay Gruber (Ca en cher

a person *ton Santen.] tob as VS, ■ 1. Wanne. EpnisYS Me beng ben Nam baan ØØ - n WI bas ØM ~ral won Pandt NI otium', cake Halm; sup~16 waag en a Marty vet" aM th• ~os san Mv,M fl es bsly MØ ne le SIM ~a ~ra. Q'S 10/08 says ~Nis been gulst*, by men n af we) ~Ooms ~Innam, sub are pang Sallas hm~

th to do so today. "It is against public policy for these documents to have been sealed and hidden from public scrutiny. As a member of the public, E.W. has the right to have these documents unsealed," wrote former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, now in private practice and representing one of the women.

, FL 33401-5012 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Martin Weinberg, Esq. Martin G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Suffolk, MA 02116 - 15 - FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM

lvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Martin Weinberg, Esq. Martin G. Weinberg, P.A. 20 Park Plaza, S

state court civil action on behalf of L.M. 31. On or about October 17, 2009, Edwards, who had filed a state complaint against Epstein on behalf of E.W., emailed his assistant to file a federal complaint against Epstein on behalf of E.W like the one he had filed in federal court on behalf of L.M.. 3

ney to whom the communication is made. Section 90.502 (2), Fla. Stat.; State v. Rabin, 475 So. 2d 257, 260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see Hoch v. Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett, 742 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999. Therefore, if the answer was evident from the complaint eventually filed by Edwards ("to seek redress f

answer the threshold "yes" or "no" question: Did [Mr. Howell] ever relate that to you." Id. 9. Edwards in one instance when asked what his client E.W. told him on the phone, himself claimed privilege. Id. at 90. Later, when asked "for what purpose did Ms. L.M. originally hire you?," his attorney o

155:7 March 6:4,5,6 mark 116:2,5,6 118:3 marked 3:22 85:15 118:5 148:25 Marla 11:3 Marra 117:2,5,12 117:13,20 marriage 10:23 married 8:10 Marty 74:5 massage 101:23 102:7 103:18 massages 102:12 mast 76:18 master's 7:1 masturbate 103:13 106:12 masturbating 105:2 105:10 mate 76:25 mat

S to strike. 14 THE MITNESS: Ho. Is BY MR. SCAROLA: IS Q If Jeffrey Epstein alleges in this 19 complaint against Bradley Edwards that III., E.W. or 24 Jane Doe voluntarily consented to their sexual 21 molestation, could Jeffrey Epstein have possibly made 22 that claim on the basis of any

nted 6:22 wasn't 28:21 way 8:23 9:9 10:5,16 10:19 11:4 13:16 14:10 19:23 25:1 25:18 27:3,4 28:22 28:23 ways 30:18 wealthy 32:13 weigh 26:11 Weinberg 2:17 4:16 4:16 Weiss 2:12 wel17:10 8:20 10:22 11:12,12,13,13 12:17 13:16 14:11 15:7 16:18 17:15 17:23 18:10,11 33:24 35:12,19,20 36:5 39:4 4

ATE OF FLORIDA, E.W., THE PALM BEACH POST, B.B, Respondents. E.W.'S SEALED REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Respondent, E.W., would show the Court as follows: 1. This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this petition. The order under review is a non-final order for which no