3
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
9 / 3
Mentions
ief on remedies on Tuesday— and that should have brought all briefing on remedies for the CVRA violation to a close. But yesterday Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply. See attached. In point (a) on page 2, he argues that he should have an opportunity to file a sur-reply discussing,
Page: EFTA00021441 →e should have an opportunity to file a sur-reply discussing, among other things, the scope of the NPA. On Monday, we will be filing an opposition to Weinberg extending the briefing further. It appears that Judge Marra is poised to rule rapidly on the motion for a sur-reply, as he asked for us to respond q
Page: EFTA00021441 →ation to a close. But yesterday Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply. See att
Page: EFTA00021441 →have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Any views he expresses in this email are his own. EFTA00021441
Page: EFTA00021441 →have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Any views he expresses in this email are his own. From: ) 4c Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 8:25 PM E
Page: EFTA00019854 →ef on remedies on Tuesday — and that should have brought all briefing on remedies for the CVRA violation to a close. But yesterday Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply. See attached. In point (a) on page 2, he argues that he should have an opportunity to file a sur-reply discussing,
Page: EFTA00019856 →e should have an opportunity to file a sur-reply discussing, among other things, the scope of the NPA. On Monday, we will be filing an opposition to Weinberg extending the briefing further. It appears that Judge Marra is poised to rule rapidly on the motion for a sur-reply, as he asked for us to respond q
Page: EFTA00019856 →ation to a close. But yesterday Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply. See att
Page: EFTA00019856 →ief on remedies on Tuesday— and that should have brought all briefing on remedies for the CVRA violation to a close. But yesterday Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply. See attached. In point (a) on page 2, he argues that he should have an opportunity to file a sur-reply discussing,
Page: EFTA00021390 →e should have an opportunity to file a sur-reply discussing, among other things, the scope of the NPA. On Monday, we will be filing an opposition to Weinberg extending the briefing further. It appears that Judge Marra is poised to rule rapidly on the motion for a sur-reply, as he asked for us to respond q
Page: EFTA00021390 →ation to a close. But yesterday Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply. See att
Page: EFTA00021390 →have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Any views he expresses in this email are his own. EFTA00021391
Page: EFTA00021391 →Entities connected to both Martin Weinberg and the Utah