Epstein Secrets

Deposition, Ex. 3 (Doc. # 223-3). Plaintiff fails to explain her strategic decision, or negligence, in failing to respond for over six weeks to Mr. Weinberg's email offering to accept service. Indeed, in another failure of candor, Plaintiff's counsel also neglected to tell this Court about the email offe

her motion to serve Mr. Epstein by alternate means. Mot. at 2; Doc. # 160.8 Plaintiff apparently now claims that she never received that email from Martin Weinberg. All of the preceding communications, however, indicate that Mr. Weinberg promptly responded to Ms. McCawley's inquiries. See, e.g., Poe Declaratio

24, this Court stated that it would consider expect to see "good faith showing" of efforts to comply with the schedule and "an inability because of Hague Convention problems," before it would consider changing the Scheduling Order. Ms. Maxwell submits that waiting until June 17, two weeks before the

blic testimony, confidential sources, local news coverage, surveillance, grand jury subpoenas, and search warrants. The Washington Post (1/26, Hsu, Weiner, Barrett, 10.52M) reports, "U.S. authorities have opened case files on at least 400 potential suspects and expect to bring sedition charges against

ters (1/26, Shepardson) reports that according to Marty Cetron, Director for the Division of Global Migr

Criminal Court officials imposed over investigations into U.S forces in Afghanistan." Reuters says the Trump Administration last year "accused the Hague-based tribunal of infringing on U.S. national sovereignty when it authorized an investigation into war crimes committed by Afghan forces, the Talib

e Policy in Europe Thesis Supervisor Mme Delmas Marty, University of Paris Sorbonne 1999 Certificate

n Washington on 25 June 20034, and the Instrument Amending the Treaty of 23 April 1996 between the United States of America and France signed in the Hague on 30 September 20045. 6. For matters not covered in these agreements, extradition requests made by the USA are governed by provisions of the Fren

e Policy in Europe Thesis Supervisor Mme Denims Marty, University of Paris Sorbonne 1999 Certificate

n Washington on 25 June 20034, and the Instrument Amending the Treaty of 23 April 1996 between the United States of America and France signed in the Hague on 30 September 20045. 6. For matters not covered in these agreements, extradition requests made by the USA are governed by provisions of the Fren

the existence of cancer, the personal testimony of the lay sufferer is entitled to no weight...... 4I Furthermore, as the Supreme Court found in Weinberger v. Hynson, Westeott and Dunning, Ine.,43: (FDA's] strict and demanding standards, barring anecdotal evidence indicating that doctors "believe" in

tional amount. The situation might be different if the suit challenged a state statute and jurisdic- tion were asserted er 28 U.S.C. 1343 (1964). Hague C. I. 0., 807 U. S. 496, 518, 69 S.Ct. , 83 L.Ed. 1423 4. See cases cited at 472 supra. (1939). The complaint here was proper- ly dismissed. The

n Washington on 25 June 20034, and the Instrument Amending the Treaty of 23 April 1996 between the United States of America and France signed in the Hague on 30 September 20045. 6. For matters not covered in these agreements, extradition requests made by the USA are governed by provisions of the Fren

e Policy in Europe Thesis Supervisor Mme Delmas Marty, University of Paris Sorbonne 1999 Certificate