Epstein Secrets

by the Trump administration upending the justice system to help the president's convicted friends." Similarly, the Washington Post (7/10, Al, Hsu, Weiner, Olorunnipa, 14.2M) reports on its front page that Trump used "the extensive powers of the presidency to protect a felon and political ally while a

n led by the Internal Revenue Service and the FBI." North Carolina Man Sentenced For Running Ponzi Scheme. The Asheville (NC) Citizen-Times (7/10, Boyle, 138K) reports, "Saying Ponzi schemer Hal Brown appeared to be 'a con man to his soul,' a federal judge on July 9 sentenced the Biltmore Park resid

fficiently specific" if it "identifies 'a group of records likely to contain helpful documents." (Defs.' PRI Opp'n, at 27 (quoting United States v. Weisberg, No. 08-CR-347 (NGG) (RML), 2011 WI. 1327689, at •7 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2011).) The subpoena requests in Weisberg, however, were much more specific t

is improper because investigative files often contain many documents that arc inadmissible on hearsay or other grounds. See. e.g., United States v. Boyle, No. 08 CR 523 (CM), 2009 WL 484436, at •2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009) (McMahon, J.) (quashing subpoena for investigative file as overbroad because al

al need" for the requested items and that he "cannot, without undue hardship, obtain their substantial equivalent by other means." United States v. Weisberg, No. 08-CR-347 NGG RML, 2011 WL 1327689, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2011). Given the marginal potential evidentiary value of the communications, the De

n's requirement that subpoenaed materials must not be otherwise procurable in advance of trial by the exercise of due diligence."); United States v. Boyle, No. 08 Cr. 523 (CM), 2009 WL 484436, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009) (quashing a 17(c) subpoena where it was "likely that many of the documents tha