Epstein Secrets

From: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com> To: "Martin G. Weinberg" Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:02:28 +0000 not sure what you mean. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Martin G. W

From: Jeffrey E. Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 5:23 PM To: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: look at this... thanks, On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Martin Weinberg la wrote: I will read the newest version when i get to computer in 1 hr Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gma

ffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com> To: "Martin G. Weinberg" Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mo

: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst case scenario,

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacatioMagmail.com>, <I Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:33:01 +0000 Importance: Normal Just

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacatioMagmail.com>, <I

l Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst case scenario,

ay, March 29, 2015 8:02 PM To: Martin G. Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE not sure what you mean. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Martin G. Weinberg c.IM > wrote: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigat

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation4gmail.eom>, <I

: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god forbid the SJ in the JE/BE case is reversed. Again, I am thinking worst case scenario,