Epstein Secrets

155:7 March 6:4,5,6 mark 116:2,5,6 118:3 marked 3:22 85:15 118:5 148:25 Marla 11:3 Marra 117:2,5,12 117:13,20 marriage 10:23 married 8:10 Marty 74:5 massage 101:23 102:7 103:18 massages 102:12 mast 76:18 master's 7:1 masturbate 103:13 106:12 masturbating 105:2 105:10 mate 76:25 mat

November of 23 2009. 24 Q Approximately 18 months -- about year and a 25 half? represented another law firm in a breakup of firma 2 And the Scherer firm waa owed over a million 4 5 4 7 • In Coos. And the client, the other law firm, was reneging on paying that. And Scherer won at the tria

even though the offices I worked II before you would file it, right? 12 out of wore in Miami. And I have heard of the Conrad 12 A Right. 13 Scherer firm throughout my practice. II Q Would you note every single fact that 14 4) You said one of the things in your direct 14 existed at the tim

ack. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Okay. Who else? A. Mr. Marty Weinberger. Mr. Alan Dershowitz. Mr. Jay Lefkowi

e unsuspecting investors out of millions of dollars. The U.S. Attorney's Complaint alleges his firm engaged in a corrupt criminal enterprise. Mr. Scherer's Complaint alleges monstrous amounts of fraud and discovery abuse. I have no personal knowledge, separate from the attorney/client privileged inf

ase No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment Page 12 of 15 reliance on public filings, including the Scherer Complaint against Rothstein is unavailing. As discussed above, the evidence warrants the finding that Epstein knew that Edwards was legitimately purs

aim, particularly where Epstein fails to allege that he was required to do something as the result of Edwards’ pursuit of the claims against him, See Marty v. Gresh, 501 So.2d 87, 90 (Fla, 1* Dist. Ct. App. 1987) (affirming summary judgment on an abuse of process claim where “appellant’s lawsuit caused