Epstein Secrets

GREEN BLVD 466-65-X.XXX (908) 889-4613 7/1977 ALLEN SCOTCH PLAINS. NJ (973) 377-1099 CALLOWAY. L A

F.3d at 1347. "The district court has 'substantial discretion' in determining whether grand jury materials should be released." Id. at 1349 (quoting Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops N.W., 441 U.S. 211, 223, 99 S. Ct. 1667, 60 L. Ed. 2d 156 (1979)). For internal use only SDNY_GM_00059572 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT

W DICTIONARY 169 (8th ed. 2004). See generally E. Allen Farnsworth, On Trying to Keep One 's Promises: T

einger, 626 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grand iury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218 (1979), and this expectation of privacy is generally codified in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Crimi

Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicusi U.S. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Wait I. Florida Power & Light Co., 372 So.2d 420 (Fla.1979). MINER, ALLEN and KAHN, IL, concur. END OF DOCUMENT Copr. °West 1995 No claim to orig. U.S. govt. works Page 1 WESTLAW ye% EFTA00183731

by the corporations which are defendants in the civil case, the considerations . . . militating against disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif, Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 211 (1979)). In response to such third-party subpoenas to law-enforcement witnesses, we anticipate that it wi

1 oomo•• run: 3 14 42 :r ink. , 443 Halms Como Allen Dotoloo 3 Out tli:D .1V Imeerrifft r Appeal

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

e, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus/ U.S. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Wait Florida Power & Light Co., 372 So.2d 420 (Fla.1979). MINER, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur. END OF DOCUMENT Copr. West 1995 No claim to orig. U.S. govt. works Page 1 WESTLAW "allillINEINISP, EFTA00233877

by the corporations which are defendants in the civil case, the considerations . . . militating against disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif. I Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 211 (1979)). In response to such third-party subpoenas to law-enforcement witnesses, we anticipate that it

W DICTIONARY 169 (8i6 ed. 2004). See generally E. Allen Farnsworth, CM Trying to Keep One's Promises: Th

inger, 626 F. Supp. 24i 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grand jury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218 (1979), and this expectation of privacy is generally codified in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Cri

W DICTIONARY 169 (8i6 ed. 2004). See generally E. Allen Farnsworth, CM Trying to Keep One's Promises: Th

winger, 626 F. Supp. 24i 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grandiury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. I. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218 (1979), and this expectation of privacy is generally codified in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Cri