Epstein Secrets

res of a revoked company? Grable II in SWORN affidavit says he alone executed the Viable SPA. LIE. The exhibit linked AGAIN below by me shows BARRED Schwartz/Linda Grable as representatives of IMDS along with Grable II. Again: the August 19 2014 Viable 13D showing ownership of the 37 billion shares EDGA

f you do the math based on the Series M conversion and adjust for 1:1000 that gets you to the 87+ million shares. AGAIN: The Viable SPA with barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II f8k062714ex10i imagingdiag.htm (sec.gov) f8k062714exl0Limagingdiag.htm - SEC WHEREAS, subject to the terms and conditi

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

res of a revoked company? Grable II in SWORN affidavit says he alone executed the Viable SPA. LIE. The exhibit linked AGAIN below by me shows BARRED Schwartz/Linda Grable as representatives of IMDS along with Grable II. Again: the August 19 2014 Viable 13D showing ownership of the 37 billion shares EDGA

f you do the math based on the Series M conversion and adjust for 1:1000 that gets you to the 87+ million shares. AGAIN: The Viable SPA with barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II f8k062714ex10i imagingdiag.htm (sec.gov) f8k062714exl0Limagingdiag.htm - SEC WHEREAS, subject to the terms and conditi

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

res of a revoked company? Grable II in SWORN affidavit says he alone executed the Viable SPA. LIE. The exhibit linked AGAIN below by me shows BARRED Schwartz/Linda Grable as representatives of IMDS along with Grable II. Again: the August 19 2014 Viable 13D showing ownership of the 37 billion shares EDGA

f you do the math based on the Series M conversion and adjust for 1:1000 that gets you to the 87+ million shares. AGAIN: The Viable SPA with barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II f8k062714ex10i imagingdiag.htm (sec.gov) f8k062714ex10i_imagingdiag.htm - SEC WHEREAS, subject to the terms and condit

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers