Epstein Secrets

orneys after learning that her successor counsel, Cooper & Kirk, had received from her former counsel, Bo

which they may have refused to testify. . . . [T]he witnesses were entitled to rely upon the terms of a concededly valid protective order and Judge Conner did not abuse his discretion in refusing to vacate or modify that order. Id. at 296-97. Three, the government did not obtain a copy of the deposit

ed" to learn that plaintiff's successor counsel, Cooper & Kirk, had received from plaintiff's former coun

nt which they may have refused to testify.... [T]he witnesses were entitled to rely upon the terms of a concededly valid protective order and Judge Conner did not abuse his discretion in refusing to vacate or modify that order. Id at 296-97. Three, the government did not obtain a copy of the depositi

ed" to learn that plaintiff's successor counsel, Cooper & Kirk, had received from plaintiff's former coun

nt which they may have refused to testify.... [T]he witnesses were entitled to rely upon the terms of a concededly valid protective order and Judge Conner did not abuse his discretion in refusing to vacate or modify that order. Id at 296-97. Three, the government did not obtain a copy of the depositi

18.48 02/25 Non-Chase ATM Withdraw 0925 80-28 Cooper Ave Glendale NY Card 5687 63.00 02/26 Mr Rever

.521.63 06/24 Non-Chase ATM Withdraw 06/22 596 Makolm X Blvd New York NY Card 2766 -200.99 6.320.64 05/24 Card Purchase 06/22 Bea 13725493500 Conner I Bronx NY Card 2766 -6400 6,25664 05/24 Non.Chase ATM Withdraw cern 3500 Corner Street Bronx NY Card 2766 -202.00 6.054.64 03/24 Card Purch

to the Protective Order. Doc.1071 at 4. The Court rejected Cooper & Kirk's suggestion that it properly was a recipient of the material: [W]hatever Cooper & Kirk's intentions in requesting and obtaining the Maxwell materials from Boies Schiller, the Maxwell Protective Order explicitly provides that (1

nt which they may have refused to testify.... [T]he witnesses were entitled to rely upon the terms of a concededly valid protective order and Judge Conner did not abuse his discretion in refusing to vacate or modify that order. M at 296-97. Three, the government did not obtain a copy of the depositio