Epstein Secrets

n re-file this reply, which is identical to the reply that was previously filed during the litigation on intervention. We only add that, in Lafler' Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012) and Missouri.. Frye, 132 S. Ct. 1399 (2012), the United States Supreme Court flatly rejected the arguments by Jane Doe 1 and

ated matters without first using the procedures available in those proceedings. See Foltz' State Fann, 331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003); Cordis Corp.' O'Shea, 988 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). The plaintiffs' arguments that the Magistrate 5 EFTA00205665 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 169 Entered on

ONSHIP DEWIOR, RAQUEL RELATIONSHIP DISCOVERY OPERATING RELATIONSHIP 0 1 1 0 0 Tenant, LLC Cooper Brothers SRL 0 Cooper, Andres Geofredo 0 Cooper, Carlos David Normand De Wior, Raquel Brestovitzky Discovery Operating Inc 0 KLAGSBRUN RELATIONSHIP Estate of Herbert Holt 0 1 FERNANDEZ, SONIA

GTMA FBO Zoe Claire Herst 0 1 ROBLON OVERSEAS RELATIONSHIP OLD ROBLON OVERSEAS 0 1 THE ELBOW TRUST, R&H TRUST (BVI) LTD AS TTEES RELATIONSHIP O'Shea, Paul FERNANDEZ, SONIA RELATIONSHIP PARIS VON GUTERSLOH INC. 0 PERLMAN, GREG RELATIONSHIP Perlman Family Living Trust 0 ■ PEZZA, JOSEPH P. REL

lt-Nielsen's tank- er division, Samuel Cooperman. Cooper- man informed Nannes that O'Brien "raisledl some

appropriateness of the investigatory methods employed, which raises voting rights and first amendment concerns. This case is distinguishable from O'Shea and City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 103 S.Ct. 1660, 76 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983) (Lyons). In O'Shea, the plaintiffs chal- lenged certain arres