Epstein Secrets

the firm had been set up. In the late 1970s, CEO Harvey Kapnick tried unsuccessfully to split the firm in

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"

the firm had been set up. In the late 1970s, CEO Harvey Kapnick tried unsuccessfully to split the firm in

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States v. Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Mini! court wrote that, under the "plain language

the firm had been set up. In the late 1970s, CEO Harvey Kapnick tried unsuccessfully to split the time in

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"