Epstein Secrets

g litigation in the "broadest and weakest sense," the court nonetheless 5 &g g, Apicella v.McNeil Labs.. Inc. 66 F.R.D. 78, 82, 85 (E.D.N.Y. 1975) (Weinstein, J.) ("In exercising this authority," under Federal Rules 26 and 37, "the court must consider the possible necessity for the information and the co

United States v. Treacv 19 603 F. Supp. 2d 670 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) STATUTES N.Y. Civil Rights Law § 79-h 3 OTHER 9 James Wm. Moore et al.. Moore's Federal Practice (3d ed. 2010) II EFTA00728013 Daily News, L.P. ("Daily News"), and Daily News journalist George Rush respectfully submit this reply memorandum o

g litigation in the "broadest and weakest sense," the court nonetheless 5 &g g, Apicella v.McNeil Labs.. Inc. 66 F.R.D. 78, 82, 85 (E.D.N.Y. 1975) (Weinstein, J.) ("In exercising this authority," under Federal Rules 26 and 37, "the court must consider the possible necessity for the information and the co

United States v. Treacv 19 603 F. Supp. 2d 670 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) STATUTES N.Y. Civil Rights Law § 79-h 3 OTHER 9 James Wm. Moore et al.. Moore's Federal Practice (3d ed. 2010) II EFTA00207336 Daily News, L.P. ("Daily News"), and Daily News journalist George Rush respectfully submit this reply memorandum o

e legacy of the poor treatment of crime victims in the criminal Bustice] process." 150 Cong. Rec. S4269 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein). In any event, the VRRA did not contain any "right to confer," or a "right to be treated with fairness. and thus it does not provide guidance for

r, as the CVRA requires, she filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3): see also 16 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3932 (3d ed. 2019) (explaining that a mandamus petition is "an original application to the court of appeals"). The question before

., 148 D. F.R. 275, 278 .Kan.1993); 4 Jack B. Weinstein and Margaret A. Berger, Wein- stein's federal Evi

ax Labs., Inc. . Twin Laboratories Inc., 183 F. .D. 458, 463, n. 8 (D.Md.1998); 8 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Richard L. Marcus, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d § 2023 at 335 (2d ed.1994)(work product materi- als are not beyond the scope of dis- covery on grounds of "privilege"). FN