Epstein Secrets

ument Summary) BIDDER: David Pecker's American Media BIDDER: Investor group of U.S. News and World Report boss Mort Zuckerman, Miramax co-Chairman (Harvey Weinstein], Cablevision CEO Jimmy Dolan, bigtime adman [Donny Deutsch] and New York Columnist [Michael Wolff]. The editing question has mostly centered on th

nce Wolff bought in Deutsch and [Jeffrey Epstein], the New York mag columnist undoubtedly expects to be picked as some kind of editorial uber boss. Weinstein is in the coalition but is still smarting over the drubbing he took in Wolff s book, "Autumn of the Moguls." Full Text (441 words) (Copyright 2003

cument URL: permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without Kravis, Henry, Deutsch, Donny, Weinstein, Harvey, Wolff, Michael, Zuckerman, Mort Business 441 http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/nypost/503 203971.html?MAC=8562d59151d6ab55 b4753a2... 11/30/2005 EFTA

he arrearage while maintain- ing his monthly mortgage payments, he probe- income tax returns with respect to interest income from funds deposited in Cayman Islands account was entered in the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of Florida, No. 85-06204, James C. Paine, J., 651 F.Su

he "tinned Kingdom-United Stater Agreement Concerning Obtaining Evidence From Cayman Islands With Regard to Narcotics Activities." The gravamen of Harvey's argu- ment is that the United States may obtain evi. had granted Harvey both transactional im- munity and use immunity for any informa- tion he had

89) 7201,' and one count of filing a false income tax return in April of 1981, a viola- tion of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1).1 The govern- ment alleges that Harvey kept millions of dollars derived from his lucrative drug dealings in a bank account in the Cayman Islands. In his individual income tax re- turn f

U.S.C. § 7206(1).1 The govern- ment alleges that Harvey kept millions of dollars derived from his lucrative drug dealings in a bank account in the Cayman Islands. In his individual income tax re- turn for the year 1980, however, Haney denied that he had any proprietary interest in, or authority over

rney, and Assistant U.S. Attorney." I said, "I would stake my life on their honor and veracity." Mr. Sands asked Mr. Kimbrough: Q. In return for Harvey's furnishing information, what was he to receive? A. I was to dismiss the Indictment against him. Q. Do you know whether or not any— A. And I would

ld not satisfy heavy burden of proving defendant under- stood government reserved right to seek property forfeiture): United States v. (Mi• chat!) Harvey, 791 F.2d at 301 (imprecision in terms of written agreement construed against the government). 11 In this case, Harvey was not granted formal st

ity, and do not face any different 'species' of immunity—e.g., an express agreement not to prosecute for future tax violations with respect to the Cayman Is- lands." Supra at 1446 n. 10. Indeed as I read the majority opinion, its holding that Harvey's immunity is only as broad as the fifth amendment

r 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Attention: Harvey Eisenberg, Esq. If, to Intermediate Holdings: A

aware limited partnership, Apollo Principal Holdings III, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership, Apollo Principal Holdings IV, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership, and any successors thereto or other entities formed to serve as holding vehicles for Apollo carry vehicles, m