Epstein Secrets

alifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729113 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 5 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 i . Fla. 2001); and Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (3"1 Cir. 2007Xunderlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery u

d)); RLS Business Ventures, IfladutmgMaglesgiug a al 784 So.2d 1194, 1195, n.2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001X"Florida courts have held that cases interpreting the Federal Rico Statute, title 18, U.S.C., are persuasive as to the meaning of Florida's Rico statute. . . "); Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729113 Do

alifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729108 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 5 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 i . Fla. 2001); and Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (3"1 Cir. 2007Xunderlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery u

d)); RLS Business Ventures, IfladutmgMaglesgiug a al 784 So.2d 1194, 1195, n.2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001X"Florida courts have held that cases interpreting the Federal Rico Statute, title 18, U.S.C., are persuasive as to the meaning of Florida's Rico statute. . . "); Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729108 Do

6/12/2009 Page 11 of 26 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 11 personal injury claim are excluded under RICO. Id. at 1211; see also Maanum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (and Cir. 2007)(underlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery u

siness Ventures. Inc. v. Second Chance Wholesale. Inc. 784 Sold 1194, 1195, n.2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001X"Florida courts have held that cases interpreting the Federal Rico Statute, title 18, U.S.C., are persuasive as to the meaning of Florida's Rico statute... "). Applying the above law with the cases cited infra, it is clear