Epstein Secrets

alifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729113 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 5 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 i . Fla. 2001); and Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (3"1 Cir. 2007Xunderlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery u

e Seeks To Recover Personal Injury Damages Significantly, Fla. Stat. Chapter 772., the Florida Civil Remedies Criminal Practices Act (hereinafter "FCRCP' or "Florida's RICO Statute) is patterned after the Federal Rico Act, 18 U.S.C. 1964(c). Therefore, as set forth in Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, Flo

alifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729108 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 5 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 i . Fla. 2001); and Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (3"1 Cir. 2007Xunderlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery u

e Seeks To Recover Personal Injury Damages Significantly, Fla. Stat. Chapter 772., the Florida Civil Remedies Criminal Practices Act (hereinafter "FCRCP' or "Florida's RICO Statute) is patterned after the Federal Rico Act, 18 U.S.C. 1964(c). Therefore, as set forth in Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, Flo

6/12/2009 Page 11 of 26 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 11 personal injury claim are excluded under RICO. Id. at 1211; see also Maanum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 224 (and Cir. 2007)(underlying wrong of continued childhood sexual abuse brought against the Archdiocese did not allow for recovery u

orida's legislative history and state case law are devoid of any explanations or rulings allowing for the recovery of personal injury damages under FCRCP. Therefore, this court must look to and rely on Federal law as it has done in the past, which states clearly around the United States that RICO is n