Epstein Secrets

REC. S7060-01, 157 Cong. Rec. S7060-01, S7060 (daily ed. Nov. 2, 2011) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (quoting his Nov. 2, 2011, letter to Attorney General Holder which, in turn, quotes this Court's decision); see also Paul G. Cassell, Nathanael J. Mitchell & Bradley J. Edwards, Crime Victims' Rights During C

sponsor Senator Kyl wrote two letters in 2011 to Attorney General Holder, specifically raising questions about the Depart

rnment deny that it sent "victim" notification letters to Jane Doe 2, both before it negotiated the NPA and after. See, e.g., DE 407 at 12,11 93-95 (Gov't Resp. to Victims' Statement of Undisputed Facts) (conceding a victim notification letter was sent to Jane Doe 2 in Jan. 2008). As the Court is well awar

ble decision from a court. See, e.g., LaRoque v. Holder, 650 F.3d 777, 791 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (allowing cas

es not cite the applicable civil rule is that it has yet to state clearly whether it is willing to abide by the civil rules in this case. See, e.g., Gov't Resp. Mot. Order Not Withhold Evid., DE #59 at 6-7 (refusing to take a position on whether civil rules apply or not). Indeed, the Government has yet to

able decision from a court. See, e.g., LaRoque.. Holder, 650 F.3d 777, 791 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (allowing cas

es not cite the applicable civil rule is that it has yet to state clearly whether it is willing to abide by the civil rules in this case. See, e.g., Gov't Resp. Mot. Order Not Withhold Evid., DE #59 at 6-7 (refusing to take a position on whether civil rules apply or not). Indeed, the Government has yet to