Epstein Secrets

Even If the Office did have such a position, however, we are mystified as to why your Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's obligations regarding production of exculpatory information to criminals, explaining "We're not he

our Office would want to assert such a position. Attorney General Holder has recently publicly discussed the Department's

. JOSEFSBERG, ESQ. 2 Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 25 West Flagler Street 3 Miami, FL 33130 For Jane Doe 101 305.358.2800 4 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 6 25 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33130 7 For Jane Doe 101 305.358.2800 8 FOR THE DEFENDANT: ROBERT D. CRI

g each particular examination.” Schlangenhauf v. Holder, 37 U.S. 104, 118, 85 S. Ct. 234, 242-243 (1964)

.net Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike MPi

elder. too. Ouge. 10 0. Did Kr • Elietein *Vet have winSaCle• dose be men? IS Ii 0 Awl 414 Ho ermieln ever lava va•••goe none by 14 these Older wane? 15 A. Yee. 16 0. When you escorted the fable In this case for 1? the masted* to the upstairs bedroom -- correct? -- you 16 would the

o the agreenents that you 12 entered Into with Mr. Epstein. In particular the I) confidentiality agreement, you were asked a question bi ll Ms. Ezell whether you understood that you're not bound 15 by anfidentiality today. And you responded in the 16 •fflrmative, tight? you tag/rasa that you're