Epstein Secrets

ler (return date 9/11/07) 8/16/2007 Subpoena to Eric Gany (return date 9/11/07) 8/17/2007 Motion of

e are several emails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz about the appointment of a GAL and the possibility of a restitution trust fund similar to the Boehm case out of Alaska. I obtained the trust fund agreement and spoke with the AUSA in 21 Mandatory restitution under § 3663A requires a conviction for

itation cases was a hot-button issue at the time. The District of Alaska USAO had a multi-victim child exploitation case with a wealthy defendant (Boehm) where they had set up a trust fund with a bank and a trustee. With Drew Oosterbaan's help, I explored setting up a similar situation in the Epstein

er 11, 2007, and subpoenas for two NES employees, Eric Gany and Harry Beller. if you will not be represe

impartial, independent representative be. appointed to administer that fund. Notably, such a restitution fund was created in a federal case, U.S. v. Boehm, Case No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Alaska 2004). The federal prosecutors here rejected this idea, and they insisted that an attorney representative, paid for

ts. The first direct observation of such a condensation from a gas of particles did not take place until 1995, by the US physicists Carl Wieman and Eric Cor- nell, another feat that was deemed worthy of a Nobel Prize. What makes the possibility of such a condensation inside bulk ma- terials such as m

and Marshak decided to save it for a presentation at an international conference in Italy in the fall. Learning of the new experimental data from Boehm, Feynman decided—rather excitedly—that his ideas were correct and began to write a paper on the subject. Gell-Mann, who was competitive in the extr