Epstein Secrets

RuSSell 3000 MSC1- Europe, Australia & Far East Barr lays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Interest

oaner vistaed Statomorollousaholione We may cento-delt aft reteed wont itasirmets mt. the tame xlins .n the same ethelcce, e.9. because they hem Werth, who abo mentan pre novo /flew...tun wtholher dents al the same erSeress I you prefer to mew M €du5 inemonts marled n apart. erneropos, you may at

ssell 3000 MSC I - Europe, Australia & Far Cast Barr lays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Intorest

000 614,019.77 -66,963.45 -1,318,998.89 5.10 5.029.45 $5.10 $5.10 Dividend and interest income earned for Oup0SeS 04 Po stserent tegabity a Werth and dikkncl income has been clekm-snecl !ken a vs 140, PPM PR ohscecioe Med Lacon the reliance of the </mon, hadt1 Mount we, a pnaaxt we, some Waal

n Urie or your Hum Equity Une el OWN account ant Bralwebieal b hind Re Ewan Orton dud be computed olaIng M AWNS Deity &arca Pialar1 The MANS Da k Barr it Waimea by adrIng h hainxes ol the armpit wed 6V.h *at* monad/ Axton' Womant end owing the royal by re number ol Ow; n the blip period Tha batrco

dayit one Pang Csb slay: in pet inn, the told teat= Wane Cowan ler art Cretrge. Dail &late 5 ctAaned Sy raNy Aral Slatarmnt salidydrig to resAb? *Werth day arm be being prof day. Oas any Cast ate seaman; Nun Fecriong ['Verb Sol te coin, OW on Nion) or asSori9d doh, 4s ..like. lej frothoyty nBakte

WO, IN1 MUMPS TAXPAYER WA« EAST STATEMENT rebore 23.2001 ciumarr Neu Mr MI», CUR MOAT -2.000 28.46100 LANDS ENO INC SHORT. CcECuTION BY BARUR COMISNON 140.00 SEC FEE 1.93 CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CORP CHät -1,800 30.50000 54,883.17 DECuTKei BY SIXC SEC FEE 1.83 CHICOS FAS INC CHCS

6., rrS Oh%CD Sullt0W1e km. Steen Semites Gyp. Ono Wined, Cain WAY, 11201.1.19 INTERNATIONAL CHARITABLE STAMAINT eIROO Fetevery 24.2001 "MOWN Werth 30.2001 ACCOUNT slASER TA.xPAYEA matt LAST STAID/ENT Fetruery 23. 2101 WANDA 140E EWE OAR TIONSAC104 Cf.301.11CN SYLICUCUSP Warr MCE DM

ommon law tort suits for damages arising out of the performance of either mandatory or discretionary acts that are, as the Supreme Court stated in Barr Matteo, "within the outer perimeter of the (employees.) line of duty." 12 This immuni- ty extends even to allegedly malicious acts." 171 It is di

suit The principal claims are for injunctive and de- claratory relief; such equitable relief is particularly suited for group representa- tion. See Werth, 422 U.S. at 516, 96 S.Ct. at 2213. Thus, we conclude that the orga- nizations have standing. IV 17, 8) Although a case may not be moot, a plaint