Epstein Secrets

tly, but later informed them that she was having difficulty obtaining the information from SSB, and recommended that they seek the information from Chase Manhattan, the Trustee of the fund. (Pls.' Mem. Of Law in Opp'n to Mot. To Dismiss, Schantz Decl. ff 6-8. ) Chase Manhattan, however, referred the plaintiff

er-borrower relationships, there is a presumption that the parties operate at arms-length and in their own interest. Jo-Ann's Launder Ctr., Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 854 F. Supp. 387, 392 (D.V.I. 1994). A fiduciary relationship may arise, however, depending upon the particular circumstances of the financi

he Amended 1999 Note. (Id. Ex. A at 8-9; Ex. B at 7-8; Ex. D at 10; Ex. E at 2-3.) Sometime in the spring of 2001, Epstein and FTC discovered that the AIG Investment was "suddenly and rapidly deteriorating." (Pls.' Mem. Of Law in Opp'n to Mot. To Dismiss, Epstein Decl. 1 20.) According to the plaintiffs, FTC's a

borrowed an additional $10 million from Citi- bank, that Epstein agreed to invest in the Mass Mutual Fund. (Mem. Of Law in Support 565 mation from Chase Manhattan, the Trust- ee of the fund. (Pls.' Mem. Of Law in Opp'n to Mot. To Dismiss, Schantz Decl. 116-8. ) Chase Manhattan, however, re- ferred the plainti

F.34 at 1422). In Count I, plaintiffs allege that the defendants' conduct "constituted the mak- ing of fraudulent misrepresentations ... regarding the AIG Investment" that the defendants knew were materially mislead- ing "because of their failure to state or disclose the additional or qualifying infor- mation re

ptly, but later informed them that she was having difficulty obtaining the information from SSB. and recommended that they seek the information from Chase Manhattan. the Trustee of the fund. (Pls' Mem. Of Law in Opp'n to Mot, To Dismiss, Schantz Dec11[1 6-8. ) Chase Manhattan, however, referred the plaintiffs b

the Amended 1999 Note. (Id. Ex. A at 8-9; Ex. B at 7-8; Ex. D at 10; Ex. Eat 2-3.) Sometime in the spring of 2001, Epstein and FTC discovered that the AIG Investment was "suddenly and rapidly deteriorating." (Pls.' Mem. Of Law in Opp'n to Mot. To Dismiss, Epstein Decl.1120.) According to the plaintiffs, FTC's ad

ptly, but later informed them that she was having difficulty obtaining the information from SSB, and recommended that they seek the information from Chase Manhattan, the Trustee of the fund. (Pls' Mem. Of Law in Opp'n to Mot. To Dismiss, Schantz Decl. ¶¶ 6-8. ) Chase Manhattan, however, referred the plaintiffs

the Amended 1999 Note. (Id. Ex. A at 8-9: Ex. B at 7-8: Ex. D at 10; Ex. Eat 2-3.) Sometime in the spring of 2001, Epstein and FTC discovered that the AIG Investment was "suddenly and rapidly deteriorating." (Pls.' Mem. Of Law in Opp'n to Mot. To Dismiss, Epstein Decl. ¶ 20.) According to the plaintiffs, FTC's a