Epstein Secrets

rgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's alleged participation, directly or indirectly, in Epstein's sex-trafficking venture by facilitating payments to women and girls, channeling funds t

personal jurisdiction over Defendant. 12. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.6(a), the undersigned believe that this action is related to Doe I v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's all

I would count Epstein's assets as a probable outflow for '08 ($120mm or so?) as I can't imagine it will stay (pending Dimon review)." III. Head of JP Morgan's Private Bank Had Close Personal Relationship With Epstein 52. Former senior executive, Jes Staley ("Staley"), developed a close relationship with Epstein when

s of suspicious activity"! 79. After JP Morgan terminated Epstein's accounts, Epstein moved his accounts to Deutsche Bank from 2013 to 2018. 80. The New York State Department of Financial Services ("NYSDFS") investigated Deutsche Bank for failures to monitor Epstein's accounts. On July 6, 2020, the NYSDFS and Deutsche Bank entered into a Cons

cluding, without limitation, physical, psychological. financial, and reputational harm. This harm was a direct, proximate, and foreseeable result of JP Morgan's attempt in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594(a). 466. By virtue of these violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1594(a), JP Morgan is liable to Jane Doe 1 and the o

personal jurisdiction over Defendant. 12. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.6(a), the undersigned believe that this action is related to Doe I v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's all

uentn16.41 PI 01/8223 6'. 12 at 123 49. 50. EFTA00162263 Cayese. 22-IkeW1BEEE4SEIR Deaactuozentrtaa PIES 01/82/23 313laff 123 III. Head of JP Morgan's Private Bank Had Close Personal Relationship With Epstein 52. Former senior executive, Jes Staley ("Staley"), developed a close relationship with Epstein when

2013-8a.pdf. 19 EFTA00162270 CEsae.:22-Ikelaga911:41-3BR Deaactuent (16. eallfilf3/23 FP'age 2:1 di a423 Deutsche Bank from 2013 to 2018. 80. The New York State Department of Financial Services ("NYSDFS") investigated Deutsche Bank for failures to monitor Epstein's accounts. On July 6, 2020, the NYSDFS and Deutsche Bank entered into a Cons

rgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's alleged participation, directly or indirectly, in Epstein's sex-trafficking venture by facilitating payments to women and girls, channeling funds t

personal jurisdiction over Defendant. 12. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.6(a), the undersigned believe that this action is related to Doe I v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's all

iled 01/10/23 Page 12 of 34 49. a. b. 50. 5I. I2 EFTA00161847 Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 16 Filed 01/10/23 Page 13 of 34 III. Head of JP Morgan's Private Bank Had Close Personal Relationship With Epstein 52. Former senior executive, Jes Staley ("Staley"), developed a close relationship with Epstein when

/2013/nr-occ-2013-8a.pdf. 19 EFTA00161854 Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 16 Filed 01/10/23 Page 20 of 34 Deutsche Bank from 2013 to 2018. 80. The New York State Department of Financial Services ("NYSDFS") investigated Deutsche Bank for failures to monitor Epstein's accounts. On July 6, 2020, the NYSDFS and Deutsche Bank entered into a Cons