Epstein Secrets

rgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's alleged participation, directly or indirectly, in Epstein's sex-trafficking venture by facilitating payments to women and girls, channeling funds t

personal jurisdiction over Defendant. 12. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.6(a), the undersigned believe that this action is related to Doe I v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's all

I would count Epstein's assets as a probable outflow for '08 ($120mm or so?) as I can't imagine it will stay (pending Dimon review)." III. Head of JP Morgan's Private Bank Had Close Personal Relationship With Epstein 52. Former senior executive, Jes Staley ("Staley"), developed a close relationship with Epstein when

29. Many of these women, particularly after Epstein's conviction in 2008, were trafficked from Eastern Europe. As the Government explained in its Second Amended Complaint, these women were recruited and, in several instances, required to many other Epstein victims in order to maintain their immigration status and the

cluding, without limitation, physical, psychological. financial, and reputational harm. This harm was a direct, proximate, and foreseeable result of JP Morgan's attempt in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594(a). 466. By virtue of these violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1594(a), JP Morgan is liable to Jane Doe 1 and the o

personal jurisdiction over Defendant. 12. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.6(a), the undersigned believe that this action is related to Doe I v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's all

uentn16.41 PI 01/8223 6'. 12 at 123 49. 50. EFTA00162263 Cayese. 22-IkeW1BEEE4SEIR Deaactuozentrtaa PIES 01/82/23 313laff 123 III. Head of JP Morgan's Private Bank Had Close Personal Relationship With Epstein 52. Former senior executive, Jes Staley ("Staley"), developed a close relationship with Epstein when

29. Many of these women, particularly after Epstein's conviction in 2008, were trafficked from Eastern Europe. As the Government explained in its Second Amended Complaint, these women were recruited and, in several instances, required to marry other Epstein victims in order to maintain their immigration status and th

rgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's alleged participation, directly or indirectly, in Epstein's sex-trafficking venture by facilitating payments to women and girls, channeling funds t

personal jurisdiction over Defendant. 12. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.6(a), the undersigned believe that this action is related to Doe I v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's all

iled 01/10/23 Page 12 of 34 49. a. b. 50. 5I. I2 EFTA00161847 Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 16 Filed 01/10/23 Page 13 of 34 III. Head of JP Morgan's Private Bank Had Close Personal Relationship With Epstein 52. Former senior executive, Jes Staley ("Staley"), developed a close relationship with Epstein when

29. Many of these women, particularly after Epstein's conviction in 2008, were trafficked from Eastern Europe. As the Government explained in its Second Amended Complaint, these women were recruited and, in several instances, required to many other Epstein victims in order to maintain their immigration status and the

borrowed an additional $10 million from Citi- bank, that Epstein agreed to invest in the Mass Mutual Fund. (Mem. Of Law in Support 565 mation from Chase Manhattan, the Trust- ee of the fund. (Pls.' Mem. Of Law in Opp'n to Mot. To Dismiss, Schantz Decl. 116-8. ) Chase Manhattan, however, re- ferred the plainti

Complaint due for 2/2/98 for Jeffrey E. Epstein ( signed by Judge Denny Chin ). (emil) (Entered: 01/14/1998) 01/20/1998 31 Affidavit of service of Second Amended Complaint as to Ellyn Bank by personal service on 1/10/98; Answer to Second Amended Complaint due on 1/30/98 for Ellyn Bank (ae) (Entered: 01/22/1998) 01/20