Epstein Secrets

Don LLP 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Tel: (617) 526-6000 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for ,IPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 37 EFTA01652928 Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 181-2 Filed 06/22/23 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT A-1 EFTA01652929 Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Docum

igible Class Members: Defendant; members of the Immediate Family of any Defendant who is an individual; current and former directors and officers of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.; Defendant's current and former legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, and any entity in which Defendant has or had a controlling int

n, and (ii) requests such a meeting. f. Trtitgi : The Claims Administrator shall provide in writing to Claimants' Counsel and counsel for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., simultaneously and in a manner that ensures confidentiality, the Allocated Amounts for all Participating Claimants on the same date within a

voted years of her career to advocating on behalf of survivors of Jeffrey Epstein, including in cases against Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the Epstein Estate. Ms. McCawley was recognized by Forbes Magazine for her "iron clad interrogation skills" during the deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell. Her work contri

cluding, without limitation, physical, psychological. financial, and reputational harm. This harm was a direct, proximate, and foreseeable result of JP Morgan's attempt in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594(a). 466. By virtue of these violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1594(a), JP Morgan is liable to Jane Doe 1 and the o

personal jurisdiction over Defendant. 12. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.6(a), the undersigned believe that this action is related to Doe I v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's all

uentn16.41 PI 01/8223 6'. 12 at 123 49. 50. EFTA00162263 Cayese. 22-IkeW1BEEE4SEIR Deaactuozentrtaa PIES 01/82/23 313laff 123 III. Head of JP Morgan's Private Bank Had Close Personal Relationship With Epstein 52. Former senior executive, Jes Staley ("Staley"), developed a close relationship with Epstein when

of Epstein's Enterprise, including the receiving and sending money to other entities they held. 117. Since they were appointed as Co-Executors of the Epstein Estate in 2019, Defendants Indyke and Kahn have approved the release of Estate funds to pay for the legal fees and costs of persons who—like the Co-Execut

rgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's alleged participation, directly or indirectly, in Epstein's sex-trafficking venture by facilitating payments to women and girls, channeling funds t

personal jurisdiction over Defendant. 12. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.6(a), the undersigned believe that this action is related to Doe I v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 1:22-cv-10019 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2022), because both actions arise from a common nucleus of operative fact involving Defendant JP Morgan's all

iled 01/10/23 Page 12 of 34 49. a. b. 50. 5I. I2 EFTA00161847 Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 16 Filed 01/10/23 Page 13 of 34 III. Head of JP Morgan's Private Bank Had Close Personal Relationship With Epstein 52. Former senior executive, Jes Staley ("Staley"), developed a close relationship with Epstein when

of Epstein's Enterprise, including the receiving and sending money to other entities they held. 117. Since they were appointed as Co-Executors of the Epstein Estate in 2019, Defendants Indyke and Kahn have approved the release of Estate funds to pay for the legal fees and costs of persons who—like the Co-Execut

ticle one hundred thirty of the penal law, pursuant to the New York Adult Survivors Act, N.Y. CPLR §214-j. The suit arises from Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s (hereinafter "JP Morgan") participation and intentional involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's widespread and well-publicized sex-trafficking ope

years, Staley helped accumulate other protectors of Epstein within JP Morgan. 161. The New York Times reported in 2019 that Mary C. Erdoes, one of JP Morgan's highest-ranking executives intervened to keep Epstein as a client after he pled guilty to sex crimes and was registered a sex offender. 162. With J

19-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 72 of 130 and the identities of the individual Class members are ascertainable through records maintained by the Epstein Estate and JP Morgan, including but not limited to JP Morgan's records for Epstein-related accounts (e.g., account ledgers reflecting payments from Epstei