Epstein Secrets

amson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand No. 101678/96, 1996 WL 350827 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Feb. 28, 1996), a leak of confidential interview transcripts from CBS to the New York Daily News during the epic face-off between 60 Minutes and whistleblower Jeffrey Wigand on one side and the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company on the other, d

bpoenas. even without regard to privilege, have not been met. (ag Point 1, supra.) Second as a matter of law, absent publication of the Ig See also Altemose Constr. Co. v. Building & Constr. Trades Council 443 F. Supp. 489 (E.D. Pa. 1977) (concluded that affidavits in the possession of television news staff ret

s does not acknowledge that its reporter has repeatedly and thoroughly disclosed the contents of the recording. For example, the single sentence in Daily News' memorandum on the disclosure to Edwards' investigator states — misleadingly — that its reporter "paraphrased aspects of the Epstein interview." Daily

from Any Other Source CONCLUSION 12 EFTA00729036 TABLE OF AUTHORMES Cases Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, No. 9:09-CV-80656-KAM (S. D. FIa. 2009) 4 Altemose Constr. Cot v. Building & Constr. Trades Council, 443 F. Supp. 489 (ED. Pa. 1977) 7 Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co., 178P.Id 1176, 1183 (Ariz. App.

amson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand No. 101678/96, 1996 WL 350827 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Feb. 28, 1996), a leak of confidential interview transcripts from CBS to the New York Daily News during the epic face-off between 60 Minutes and whistleblower Jeffrey Wigand on one side and the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company on the other, d

bpoenas. even without regard to privilege, have not been met. (ag Point 1, supra.) Second as a matter of law, absent publication of the Ig See also Altemose Constr. Co. v. Building & Constr. Trades Council 443 F. Supp. 489 (E.D. Pa. 1977) (concluded that affidavits in the possession of television news staff ret