Epstein Secrets

amson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand No. 101678/96, 1996 WL 350827 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Feb. 28, 1996), a leak of confidential interview transcripts from CBS to the New York Daily News during the epic face-off between 60 Minutes and whistleblower Jeffrey Wigand on one side and the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company on the other, d

McKenna. J.). " Notably. Mr. Fisten claims he "wrote up a report memorializing what Rush had told me" shortly after his conversation with Mr. Rush (Fisten Aft*" I I) but chooses not to attach the memo to his affidavit. - 8 - EFTA00728021 As to the supposed "damning admission," Rush attests that neither

s does not acknowledge that its reporter has repeatedly and thoroughly disclosed the contents of the recording. For example, the single sentence in Daily News' memorandum on the disclosure to Edwards' investigator states — misleadingly — that its reporter "paraphrased aspects of the Epstein interview." Daily

d portions of the tape immediately called Edwards' investigator and said, "My god, you've [got to] get this tape. [Epstein] talks about the girls." Fisten Aft at I 3. Similarly, Judge McKenna — who had the benefit of listening to the recording' — specifically ruled that the recording contains statements t

amson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand No. 101678/96, 1996 WL 350827 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Feb. 28, 1996), a leak of confidential interview transcripts from CBS to the New York Daily News during the epic face-off between 60 Minutes and whistleblower Jeffrey Wigand on one side and the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company on the other, d

McKenna. J.). " Notably. Mr. Fisten claims he "wrote up a report memorializing what Rush had told me" shortly after his conversation with Mr. Rush (Fisten Aft*" I I) but chooses not to attach the memo to his affidavit. - 8 - EFTA00207344 As to the supposed "damning admission," Rush attests that neither