Epstein Secrets

minority. 17. The above-described acts were perpetrated upon the person of the then minor Plaintiff on numerous occasions. 18. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation

scinded where parties seeking rescission on basis of duress treated agreements as binding and sought benefits pursuant to the agreements) (applying New Hampshire law); Diffenderfer v. Heublein, Inc., 412 F.2d 184, 188-89 (8th Cir. 1969) (concluding that contract, even if procured by duress, was ratified by ac

minority. 17. The above-described acts were perpetrated upon the person of the then minor Plaintiff on numerous occasions. 18. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation

scinded where parties seeking rescission on basis of duress treated agreements as binding and sought benefits pursuant to the agreements) (applying New Hampshire law); Diffenderfer v. Heublein, Inc., 412 F.2d 184, 188-89 (8th Cir. 1969) (concluding that contract, even if procured by duress, was ratified by ac

minority. 17. The above-described acts were perpetrated upon the person of the then minor Plaintiff on numerous occasions. 18. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation

scinded where parties seeking rescission on basis of duress treated agreements as binding and sought benefits pursuant to the agreements) (applying New Hampshire law); Diffendetfer v. Heublein, Inc., 412 F.2d 184, 188-89 (8th Cir. 1969) (concluding that contract, even if procured by duress, was ratified by ac

nts, and precluded by the doctrines of equitable and judicial estoppel. 7 EFTA00299027 BACKGROUND On July 19, 2006, Mr. Epstein was indicted in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County on one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Fla. Stat. §796.07. See State v. Jeffiey E. Epstein, 50-

udicial SO EFTA00299070 process," id., which prohibits "parties from deliberately changing positions according to the exigencies of the moment." New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 749-50 (2001). "Stated simply, the doctrine of judicial estoppel rests on the principle that "absent any good explanation,

minority. 17. The above-described acts were perpetrated upon the person of the then minor Plaintiff on numerous occasions. 18. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation

scinded where parties seeking rescission on basis of duress treated agreements as binding and sought benefits pursuant to the agreements) (applying New Hampshire law); Diffendelfer v. Heublein, Inc., 412 F.2d 184, 188-89 (8th Cir. 1969) (concluding that contract, even if procured by duress, was ratified by ac