Epstein Secrets

5 (L.M. v. Epstein). In both amended complaints, petitioners "briefly alleged" some more about the non-prosecution agreement: 20. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of

nded to make a mockery of the judicial system. Id. at *4. In adopting the two-part test, the Eleventh Circuit expressly considered New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742 (2001), a Supreme Court decision which utilized a three-part test for the application of judicial estoppel, including the plaintiff's

5 (L.M. v. Epstein). In both amended complaints, petitioners "briefly alleged" some more about the non-prosecution agreement: 20. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of

nded to make a mockery of the judicial system. Id. at *4. In adopting the two-part test, the Eleventh Circuit expressly considered New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742 (2001), a Supreme Court decision which utilized a three-part test for the application of judicial estoppel, including the plaintiff's

nts, and precluded by the doctrines of equitable and judicial estoppel. 7 EFTA00299027 BACKGROUND On July 19, 2006, Mr. Epstein was indicted in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County on one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Fla. Stat. §796.07. See State v. Jeffiey E. Epstein, 50-

00299070 process," id., which prohibits "parties from deliberately changing positions according to the exigencies of the moment." New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 749-50 (2001). "Stated simply, the doctrine of judicial estoppel rests on the principle that "absent any good explanation, a party s