Epstein Secrets

D to bring with you the following document(s) or object(s): Please coordi of this subpoena and confum the date and time of ur a ante with Special Agen Federal Bureau of Investigation, Telephone: Please see additional information on reverse This subpoena shall remain in effect until you are granted leave to depart by the court or

ember I, 2006 9:00am Please coordinate your compliance of this subpoena and confirm the date and time of your a ranee with Special Agent-Federal Bureau of Investigation, Telephone: Please see additional information on '.et sc This subpoena shall remain in effect until you arc granted leave to depart by the court or

ple under Florida law that a witness' testimony in a judicial proceeding cannot be used as the basis of a defamation anion. See, e.g.. State v. Tiller, Ill So.2d 716 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1959). IV. In light of our conclusion that appellants have no privilege of nondisclosure under state law, we

him in exchange for money. Displeased with the way the State Attorney's Office handled the case, Palm Beach police later forwarded information to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Epstein's own attorneys, in federal filings, have referred to Epstein's deferred prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors as "unprecedented"

harassment. A prominent Colorado abortion provider said he understands the family's decision but fears that the news, announced 10 days after Tiller's slaying, will inspire tactics designed to drive others out of busi- ness. it's hideous that it's come to this," said War- ren Hern, who is amon

I200. FORT LAUDERDALE. FL 33301-2211• PH. 954.356.0011 • FAX 954.356.0022 Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Email: February 26, 2015 Via Federal Express Federal Bureau of Investigation Attn: FOI/PA Request Reeord/Information Dissemination Section Federal Bureau of Investigation Department of Justice RE: FOL4 Request for pictures, vide

nciple wider Florida law that a witness' testimony in a judicial proceeding cannot be used as the basis of a defamation mien. See, e.g.. Sae v. Tiller, 111 So.24 716 (FLi.Dist.O.App.1959). IV. In light of our conclusion that appellants have no privilege of nondisclosure under state law, we a