Epstein Secrets

Gerald Castor is the owner of Balbo Construction which performed construction work for the parties on the marital homestead located at IB-29 Estate Solberg. In the civil action. Babo alleges that the parties are liable for outstanding payments amounting to Three Hundred Ninety Six Thousand. Five Hundred

stipulate or concede to the amount of monetary relief alleged in the pleading.= The parties also stipulated that the marital homestead, IB-29 Estate Solberg, St. Thomas. U.S. Virgin Islands, is valued at Seven Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($725,000.00) subject to a mortgage of One Hundred Ten Th

r 35, 725 A.2d 829, 831 (1999). Once these distinctions have been made, the trial judge has broad equitable powers in disposing of marital property. Fuentes, 38 V.I. at 35, 1997 WL 889532, at *5. [5] [HN4]Although not specifically defined, marital property ['23] has been construed to encompass any prop

Gerald Castor is the owner of Balbo Construction which performed construction work for the parties on the marital homestead located at 16-29 Estate Solberg. In the civil action. Balbo alleges that the parties are liable for outstanding payments amounting to Three Hundred Ninety Six Thousand. Five Hundre

stipulate or concede to the amount of monetary relief alleged in the pleading.= The parties also stipulated that the marital homestead, IB-29 Estate Solberg, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, is valued at Seven Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($725,000.00) subject to a mortgage of One Hundred Ten Th

r 35, 725 A.2d 829, 831 (1999). Once these distinctions have been made, the trial judge has broad equitable powers in disposing of marital property. Fuentes, 38 V.I. at 35, 1997 WL 889532, at '5. [5] IHN41Although not specifically defined, marital property [e23] has been construed to encompass any prop

Page 31 2014 V.I. LEXIS 45, *; 61 V.I. 13, ** [3] The Court has considered that the parties resided in the Solberg home from 2005-2012 for approximately seven (7) of their twenty one (21) years of marriage with their children. Mr. Francis' mother has occupied an

stead and not the entire property known as IB-29 Estate Solberg. In view of the circumstances surrounding the acquisition and construction of IB-29 Solberg, maintenance and occupancy of said property, the Court finds that based on a balancing of equities, Mr. Francis should retain possession of the mar

r 35, 725 A.2d 829, 831 (1999). Once these distinctions have been made, the trial judge has broad equitable powers in disposing of marital property. Fuentes, 38 V.I. at 35, 1997 WL 889532, at *5. [5] [HN4] Although not specifically defined, marital property [1.23] has been construed to encompass any pr