Epstein Secrets

OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e-mail and U.S. Mail on this 16th day of February, 2012 to: Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, E., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury,

Mail on this 16th day of February, 2012 to: Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley,

s inadmissible when the evidence is introduced solely to prove bad character, or that the person acted in conformity with his character. See, e.g., Jacobs v. Westgate, 766 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (error to admit evidence that roommate bounced checks in action for negligent disposition of propert

: Primary: Second. Second. Second. Second (FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00793363 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. .-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 Co-Counsel

Second. Second (FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00793363 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. .-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Pl

the notions of fair trial for the state to force a defendant to resurrect a prior defense against a crime for which the defendant is not on trial." Jacobs v. All. Coast Ref, Inc., 165 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 4`h DCA 2015) (finding that "because the prior case was settled, none of the allegations therein were

RVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Be

neys for Epstein 24 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585443 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . Atte ury, o erger, c Weiss, PA 2

a. 4th DCA 2009). "[E]ven if relevant, a trial court may not permit the collateral crime evidence to become an impermissible feature of the trial." Jacobs v. At!. Coast Ref, Inc., 165 So. 3d 714, 718 (Fla. 4th DCA. 2015), reh'g denied (June 9, 2015) (citing Durousseau v. State, 55 So.3d 543, 551 (Fla.