Epstein Secrets

t Edwards and Cassell made in this other lawsuit are somehow 2 binding on Ms. Edwards and Cassell had separate legal 3 counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on 4 in that case isn't binding on Ms. 5 Under the relevant rules, an attorney's statements are 6 binding on a client only

separate legal 3 counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on 4 in that case isn't bin

motion reads like a list 9 of everything plaintiff has lied about or anything that would 10 undercut her claim for damages. 11 Plaintiff quoted Passim in her reply brief from a 12 particular federal evidence treatise, and I would like to tell 13 the Court, she left out the most important parts,

that Edwards and Cassell made in this other lawsuit are somehow binding on Ms. . Edwards and Cassell had separate legal counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on in that case isn't binding on Ms. 5 Under the relevant rules, an attorney's statements are 6 binding on a client only on

ad separate legal counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on in that case isn't bindin

he omnibus motion reads like a list of everything plaintiff has lied about or anything that would undercut her claim for damages. Plaintiff quoted Passim in her reply brief from a particular federal evidence treatise, and I would like to tell the Court, she left out the most important parts, and that

Edwards and Cassell made in this other lawsuit are somehow binding on Ms. Giuffre. Edwards and Cassell had separate legal counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on in that case isn't binding on Ms. Giuffre. Under the relevant rules, an attorney's statements are binding on a client only o

had separate legal counsel, Florida attorney Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on in that case isn't binding

The omnibus motion reads like a list of everything plaintiff has lied about or anything that would undercut her claim for damages. Plaintiff quoted Passim in her reply brief froma particular federal evidence treatise, and I would like to tell the Court, she left out the most important parts, and that i